Recently, there was a "16-year-old three-child non-biological case" in Jiangxi, which attracted widespread attention from the society, but the latest follow-up results were surprising.
It turned out that the man's Douyin account Chen Zhixian was officially banned!What exactly happened in this chain of events, and why did the platform make such a decision?
You must know that Xie Qingshuai's family brought goods live immediately after the reunion, does this mean that the platform has a double standard?
Jiangxi's "16-year-old three-child non-biological case" initially attracted widespread public attention, Chen Zhixian disclosed his tragic experience through the Douyin platform, and his wife's cheating and betrayal made him fall into extreme pain.
But the latest news is that Chen Zhixian's Douyin account has been banned, which is confusing.
After the release of ** news, the number of followers of Chen Zhixian's Douyin account increased rapidly, from more than 200,000 to more than 600,000.
In this process, Chen Zhixian has posted on the platform many times, and it has also become the focus of heated discussions among netizens.
But just earlier, the platform took measures to ban his account, which caused widespread questions and disgust.
The official ban on Chen Zhixian's Douyin account has aroused doubts from all walks of life, and the official reason given is that Chen Mouxian used contradictions to hype, exaggerate facts, and fabricate plots.
However, judging from the facts Chen Zhixian said, there was no exaggeration or fiction, and he just expressed his experience through the platform, which aroused public attention to this case.
So, what exactly led to this decision of the platform?
There is a view that the platform may be worried that Chen Zhixian's behavior will cause more controversy and social **, and has adopted the means of banning the broadcast to avoid potential risks.
This has also triggered speculation among netizens about whether the platform has double-standard behavior, and compared with some previous live broadcast incidents, the platform did not adopt a ban attitude, this decision has caused more controversy.
After all, before this, Xie Qingshuai's live broadcast incident had attracted public attention, and Xie Qingshuai made a series of inappropriate remarks in the live broadcast, but he was not banned by the platform.
On the contrary, Chen Zhixian was banned when he expressed his tragic experience, which raised questions about whether the platform has double standards.
Perhaps, the difference between the Xie Qingshuai incident and the Chen Zhixian incident is that the former did not touch on socially sensitive topics, while Chen Zhixian's incident involved socially sensitive issues such as marital betrayal and family conflicts, which made the platform more cautious in handling it.
Regardless, it also raises concerns about whether platforms are holding different standards for different people.
In this case, some people believe that Chen Zhixian's Douyin account was banned and deserved, believing that he should be responsible for the choices he made by hyping up his marital conflicts and making his personal affairs public, ushering in attention.
Others, on the other hand, believe that the platform has double-standard behavior, and has adopted inconsistent standards for handling similar incidents.
Perhaps, this is a question that needs to be carefully considered, and in the era of information dissemination, how platforms can effectively manage inappropriate speech while ensuring freedom of speech has become an urgent problem to be solved.
When dealing with similar incidents, whether the platform should be more objective and fair and avoid the emergence of double standards will become a topic worthy of attention.
From Chen Zhixian's Douyin account ban to the whole society's questioning of the platform, it has highlighted the problems of freedom of speech and management in the information age.
When dealing with such incidents, platforms need to weigh the relationship between freedom of expression and social responsibility, and avoid the emergence of double standards.
For individuals, it is also necessary to be cautious about expressing their experiences through the Internet, so as not to become a hype tool and arouse excessive attention from society.
Perhaps, in this process, all parties in society can work together to come up with more reasonable and just solutions and promote the healthy development of the information society.
However, then again, Chen Zhixian is indeed the only victim in this case, but he plans to take advantage of the opportunity to make a profit by selling miserably, which is a bit unkind.
After all, the sympathy of netizens can't be abused by you like this!Behind the case of 16 years of marriage and 3 babies who are not biological