Follow me and I will share some interesting stories and experiences on a regular basis to exchange educational experiences together.
In 2024, prospective high school juniors are facing intense revisions to get into their dream university. For most students, the gaokao is an opportunity to change their fate, and choosing well-known and promising universities and majors can increase the employment rate after graduation. However, the political review process has left some students feeling confused and unfair. For students with relatives of criminals, why do they pay for their parents' mistakes?This article will discuss the necessity of political trials and the impact on students and society, and call for the relaxation of restrictions on political trials for children who have committed crimes.
1. Requirements for candidates in the political examination
Most candidates hope to pass the political examination and successfully enter the joint public security examination such as military academies and police academies. However, the political examination is not just for individuals, but also for all students who apply for the examination. This is a way to ensure that candidates meet the ethical and professional standards of public officeholders.
2. In-depth understanding of the candidate's family background
An important purpose of the political examination is to gain insight into the candidate's family background to ensure that they are not involved in criminal acts. The political examiner will review three generations of the student's immediate family to determine if there are other violations or misdeeds. Such an audit can help screen out trustworthy public officeholders of good moral character.
3. Prevent the occurrence of the phenomenon of "continuous sitting".
The existence of political trials can prevent the occurrence of the phenomenon of "joint sitting". If the trial is abolished, it may encourage offenders to use their children to enter public office and thus evade legal accountability. The requirements of the political review are to separate the responsibility for the crime from the relatives of the offender, to ensure that every candidate is reviewed according to the same standards, and to provide a level playing field.
1. The impact on students' employment prospects
The impact of political trial restrictions on children who commit crimes may limit their employment prospects. Although students have excellent personal performance and the ability to become good police officers and other public officials, they may be forced to abandon their dream careers if their parents have criminal records. This is unfair to delinquent children who have not committed a crime themselves.
2. It is difficult to get rid of social prejudices
Restrictions on criminal trials also mean that it is difficult for children who commit crimes to escape prejudice and discrimination in society. Even if they themselves have not committed a crime, they face resistance to employment and social interaction through the fault of their relatives. This social bias can take a serious toll on their mental health and self-confidence.
3. Consideration of educational significance
One view of the removal of the restriction on political trials is that children who have committed crimes should be given the opportunity to rehabilitate. The existence of criminal law should serve as an education and rehabilitation, and everyone should have the opportunity to change their future. An overemphasis on paternal responsibility may limit the development of delinquent children and prevent them from proving their worth and their ability to rehabilitate.
1. Consider personal effort and excellent performance
* and the relevant departments should relax the standards for the restrictions on political trials based on the individual performance and efforts of the children who have committed crimes. If the student has demonstrated excellent qualities and abilities and has passed all other assessments, they should be given the opportunity to make amends. Such a change would neither affect the moral and professional standards of public officeholders, nor would it confuse criminal responsibility with the relatives of the perpetrators.
2. Strengthen social education and support
At the same time, society should also strengthen education and support for children who have committed crimes. By providing more educational opportunities and training, we will create more development opportunities for them and help them get rid of the shadow of their parents' criminal behavior. At the same time, society should embrace the concept of tolerance and tolerance, and not blame itself for the fault of the children who have committed crimes.
Political censorship exists to screen out trustworthy public officeholders with good moral qualities. However, there is also some controversy about the restrictions on the political trial of children who have committed crimes. The view of relaxing the restrictions on political trials is that they should be given the opportunity to make amends based on their individual performance and efforts. Society should also strengthen education and support for children who have committed crimes. In this regard, I believe that it is necessary to take into account factors such as personal efforts, family background and social environment, so as to ensure the moral and professional standards of public officeholders and to give adequate opportunities for the development of children who have committed crimes. In this way, we can build a just, inclusive and equitable society.
Your attention is my motivation, and your support is the direction we are heading. Follow me and you can see my latest articles, hear my unique insights and in-depth analysis on a variety of topics, and let's explore the ocean of knowledge together!