Introduction: In 2024, students preparing for the college entrance examination are preparing intensively, hoping to pass this fateful exam and successfully enter their ideal university or college. When choosing a university, students are becoming more rational and more inclined to choose colleges and majors with better job prospects to ensure a future path. However, when it comes to choosing universities and majors, there are some special institutions that have a higher entry threshold, such as military academies and police academies. For the police academy, it is not only necessary to look at the students' grades, but also to go through the links of physical examination and political examination, and even to review the students' immediate family members. Therefore, when a student's father makes a mistake that affects the outcome of the student's political trial, the student will wonder - "Why should I pay for it?".The political examiner's answer left the students scratching their heads and causing them to fall into a silent silence.
As an exam with a high pass rate, the public security joint examination has almost reached a pass rate of 90%. Only fresh graduates of public security majors in public security police academies are eligible to apply for the examination. Students should understand this before applying for the exam. However, the recruitment criteria of the police academy are not limited to students' grades, but also include physical examinations and political examinations. Students who do not meet the criteria in either of these areas will not be admitted. In particular, the requirements for political examination are high. Not only will students be vetted, but also relatives of three generations of the student's immediate family will be reviewed.
Expanding: As an exam with a high pass rate, the public security joint examination has naturally attracted the attention of students. Especially those students who yearn for iron jobs and dream of becoming people's policemen are full of expectations for this. The entry threshold for the public security joint examination is indeed self-evident, and only fresh graduates in public security majors have the opportunity to apply for the examination. This is something that students should understand and consider when choosing a major. In addition, in addition to the student's individual grades, physical examination and political examination are also key links. Students must ensure that they meet the criteria in all of these areas in order to be admitted. In particular, the political audit is conducted with students and their immediate families to ensure that the excellent tradition of the police academy can be continued.
Student Xiao Li has always had a dream of being a policeman, and in order to realize this dream, he studied hard and also achieved good results in the college entrance examination. However, Xiao Li did not pass the political trial in the end, which he found difficult to accept, and asked the political examiner: "Why did my father make a mistake and make me pay?"Xiao Li believes that the times have progressed, and the punishment method of "joint sitting" should no longer be adopted. He believes he has the potential to be a good police officer, and expects the political judge to be more lenient with him. However, the political examiner's answer left him speechless. The political examiner said that if everyone thinks that they can be admitted by making a fuss, then what management is there?Everyone feels that the misfortune will not affect the children and grandchildren, and will not they be even more unscrupulous?At the same time, the political review requires that all students be treated equally, and all students must be subject to the same standards, and there will be no unfairness.
Expanding: Xiao Li's experience is embarrassing. He has long wanted to become a police officer, but behind the hard work is an insurmountable threshold. When Xiao Li learned that he had failed the political trial, his heart was full of endless questions. "Why should I bear my father's fault?Xiao Li believes that he is innocent and that he should be assessed as an independent individual, rather than being affected by his father's mistakes. He believed in his own efforts and potential, and believed that the political trial should give him a new chance. However, the political examiner's answer poured cold water on him. "If everyone thinks that they can pass the political review with a little trouble, then how can they manage it?Everyone feels that the disaster will not affect the children and grandchildren, and will not they be even more careless in acting willfully?The political examiner gave Xiao Li a clearer understanding of the requirements of the political trial, and truly understood the fairness and necessity of the political trial.
Political review of students' political issues, qualities, and family backgrounds often leads to a series of controversies and confrontations of different views. Some netizens believe that a student who studies hard and achieves excellent grades should not be implicated by his parents' past mistakes. They believe that giving students the opportunity to turn over a new leaf and a level playing field is the way to go. In a commentary by Mr. Luo Xiang, he also expressed a similar view, arguing that the law should be educational, giving a person the opportunity to reform and space for future development. However, there are also some netizens who believe that the cancellation of the three-generation search may increase the probability of crime. They argue that a person's family environment and the behavior of their parents often have a profound impact on them, and therefore the requirement of political review should be retained. Some netizens pointed out that if a person enjoys the benefits that their parents have sought for them, then it is natural for them to pay for their parents' past mistakes. They think it's time to question parents who keep making mistakes in order to behave badly.
Expansion: The controversy and divergence of views in the political trial cannot be ignored. One side argues that the requirements for political review are too strict and ignore the independence and value of the individual. They believe that students' hard work and personal qualities and potential should be the key to judging whether a person is suitable for a particular career, and that past mistakes should not be a stumbling block in their path forward. These perspectives focus more on giving students the opportunity to turn over a new leaf and a level playing field. Mr. Luo Xiang shared a similar view in one of his comments, arguing that the purpose of education should be to make a person reform and give him room for development. However, the other side argues that the requirements and restrictions of the political review are necessary. They believe that family background has a greater impact on an individual's growth and behavior, and that a person's suitability for a particular occupation should also be considered comprehensively. In addition, they are also worried that if the restrictions on political trials are lifted, the probability of crime may be increased and the professional quality of special occupations may be reduced, which will be detrimental to the stability and security of society as a whole. Some netizens believe that if a person enjoys the benefits that their parents seek for them, then they should also pay for their parents' faults. Therefore, they believe that the political trial request is reasonable, and they should even question those parents who do not behave well and continue to make mistakes.
From the current point of view, the political examination is a link for all candidates who apply for military academies and police academies and engage in special occupations, which is fair and necessary. The examination of individual students and their family backgrounds helps to ensure the professional quality and social stability of special occupations. The requirements and standards of the political review are fair to all students, and there is no unfairness. The political examination not only focuses on the student himself, but also examines the student's relatives, so as to also examine whether a person is suitable for a particular occupation as a whole. Political examination is a part of a comprehensive investigation of a person's comprehensive quality and background, which ensures the fairness of recruitment and the improvement of professional quality.
Expanding: The fairness and necessity of political review are worth discussing. The political examination is not a specific examination of a specific individual, but a necessary examination of the vast number of candidates who apply for military academies and police academies and engage in special occupations. Political review focuses not only on the individual's political issues and qualities, but also on his or her family background and influence. Such a comprehensive review helps to ensure the professional quality of the particular occupation and the stability of society. The requirements and restrictions of the political examination are fair, and all candidates need to go through the political examination according to the same standards, and there is no unfairness. The political examination attaches importance to the overall overall quality and background, and the examination of the student's relatives is also to examine whether a person is suitable for a special occupation as a whole. The requirements and standards of political examination ensure the fairness of recruitment for special occupations and the improvement of professional quality, which is a necessary part. The fairness and necessity of political examination should be fully recognized and understood, so as to ensure the professional quality of special occupations and the security and stability of society.