The "barrel of a gun" in finance The Foreign Investment Commission "comes out of the barrel of a gun".
The financial war is in full swing, and "power comes out of the barrel of a gun" is still true for financial warfare, so what is the barrel of a gun in financial warfare?Mr. Lu Qiyuan said well, "Without asset management, it is equivalent to surrendering a gun". Asset management is the "barrel of a gun" against "financial warfare". , 1, the "barrel of the gun" of the United States financial - Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
There is always an indispensable ** institution for Chinese companies to invest in the United States: the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). It is increasingly scrutinizing Chinese companies when acquiring U.S. companies. Overseas acquisitions by Chinese companies are still in full swing, and news of deal blockages has also come from time to time, such as China's Unigroup Group's acquisition of Western Digital Corporation and China's chemical group's acquisition of Syngenta Group, all of which have been hampered by an agency called the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
In 1975, CFIUS was established. In order to prevent foreign mergers and acquisitions from threatening itself, Ford issued Executive Order No. 11858, deciding to establish the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to assess and review the risks involved in foreign investment and mergers and acquisitions in the United States.
CFIUS is generally the Secretary of the Treasury, and the real person in charge of operations should be the US Treasury Department's Under Secretary for International Affairs, who is in charge of US foreign economic sanctions and other functions. CFIUS has enormous powers, and the Executive Order gives CFIUS the power to bring in other departments to participate in the review as needed to review each merger and acquisition.
2. There is no asset management, which is equivalent to paying a "gun".
National security not only means national defense and information security, but also financial security in the financial sector. There is no internal and external management of capital. Managing domestic and foreign consortia, especially domestically, is an important task at present, that is, the main aspect of contradictions. It's not solved well, it's a big problem. In fact, it is nothing more than handling the boundary of interests, and Huawei has already set an example for us. That is, the key to management lies in the "degree" of materialist dialectics.
3. Straw sandals are not the same, and they are like while playing.
First of all, it is necessary to set up a corresponding institution and manage the assets first. Straw sandals are unliked, like while beating. The right thing should be done as soon as possible, the economic cycle does not have only one pole of influence, but without this pole of influence, we will lose more poles of influence, we don't want to leave the temporary pots and jars, we will throw away a bunch of long-lasting, more pots and jars. "Without asset management, it is equivalent to surrendering a gun." Some taxes should be in place, and some ministries should be in place. How to play without a "gun"?
References: 1, Lu Qiyuan I am not against marketization, but the premise must be national asset management, which is not equivalent to handing over guns;
2. Wei Liang, International Herald Leader: The Mysterious Extralegal Place: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which is hostile to Chinese companies;
3. Hum Bo manage domestic and foreign consortia well;