InCarscircles, high-end business wars often have fierce arguments. Recently,He XiaopengwithYu ChengdongThe debate over the Automatic Emergency Braking System (AEB) is not just about the AEB technology itself, it's about itIntelligent drivingofThe right to speakScramble. This article will start with the mutual tearing of the two enterprise executives, and gradually unfold the beginning and end of the AEB dispute, and delve into the first AEB technology andIntelligent drivingThe importance of the final appeal is not to rely entirely on the AEB when driving.
He XiaopengIn an interview, he expressed his opinion on AEB technology and urban NGP, believing that a lot of the current propaganda about AEB is false, whileYu Chengdongthen inCircle of friendsIn response, some car companies don't even understand what AEB is. This mutual tear has attracted the attention and participation of many high-level car companies, and has gradually escalated into a public debate.
The "AEB controversy" seems to revolve around the automatic emergency braking system, but it is actually elevatedIntelligent drivingThe right to speakheight. AEB asIntelligent drivingAn important feature that can be passedRadarDetect the distance to the vehicle or obstacle in front of you, determine whether there is a risk of collision based on distance and speed, and trigger emergency braking or deceleration to avoid accidents. This technology has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of accidents. Therefore, whoever wins in the battle for AEB is in the placeIntelligent drivingfield moreThe right to speak
AEB as an active safety feature already had some in the era of oil trucksLuxury carstype equipped. However, there are still some controversies and questions about AEB technology. Among them, the two most important questions are: whether the brake can be braked in time when the brake is needed, and whether the brake can be avoided by mistake when the brake is not needed. However, due to the lack of rigorous testing and unified evaluation standards, it is not yet possible to make an accurate judgment on the AEB technology of car companies. In addition, the calibration of AEB technology is also a problem that plagues technical personnel, and different car companies have different calibration methods for AEB technology, and there is a lack of unified standards.
Intelligent drivingTechnology has become one of the most important factors in consumers' car purchase decisionsIntelligent drivingEnterprises with excellent technology in the field will be more competitive. In the AEB controversy,HuaweiWith ADS20 AdvancedIntelligent drivingsystem,XpengThe main focus is XNGP technology (full-scene intelligent assisted driving). Whoever has the upper hand in this argument will be in itIntelligent drivingThe field shows strongerThe right to speak。In addition, in the "no map" intelligent driving layout,XpengThere was also competition with the questioning world. Xpeng MotorsIt is planned to open the urban navigation assisted driving function in 20 cities without high-precision maps, and Wenjie said that the new M7 does not rely on high-precision maps and is high-endIntelligent drivingThe feature will be nationwide by the end of the year.
It's important to note that AEB isn't a panacea, and it has limitations. Complex scenes, sensor states, and other obstacles may affect the normal operation of the AEB. Therefore, even with AEB technology, you cannot fully rely on it while driving, and you still need to maintain concentration.
Summary: Although the AEB dispute seems to be just a debate about a technical function, it is essentially involvedIntelligent drivingThe right to speakThe scramble. AEB as an active safety featureCarsThe industry has had certain applications, but its calibration problems and technical limitations still exist. InCarsIn the wave of industry intelligence, whoever can win the battle for AEB may be thereIntelligent drivingThe field occupies a stronger position. However, no matter how advanced the technology is, there is still a need to be vigilant when driving and you can't rely solely on technology.