Filing multiple patent applications with apparently identical contents.
For example, if the application is substantially the same, only a simple change is made, and the substantially the same design, the difference is only applied to the sticker, bag and box.
For example, in the case of an invention-creation, the application is filed consecutively without paying a fee or going through the formalities of registration of the grant.
Filing multiple patent applications that clearly copy prior art or designs.
Example: Copying someone else's existing design.
Example: A simple combination of known technologies that does not produce a new technical effect.
File multiple patent applications that are simply replaced or patchworked.
Example: Simple replacement or patchwork of different materials.
Example: Different components and ratios are simply replaced or patchworked.
Submitting multiple pieces of experimental data or fabricating obvious technical effects.
For example, the invention patent application in the field of traditional Chinese medicine, the subject matter is the preparation method of traditional Chinese medicine for a certain disease, and the description of the disease does not belong to the scientific terms in the field of medicine.
For example, the inventor is involved in a wide range of fields or fields beyond the business scope of the enterprise, which is obviously not in line with personal R&D capabilities and deviates from the objective law of scientific and technological R&D.
Filed a number of patent applications that randomly generate product shapes, patterns, or colors using computer technology, etc.