The case of the man being framed in the subway has made waves again, and Mr. He has appealed.
Chengdu, on December 28, in the context of the "Chengdu Metro was framed ** case", the party Mr. He has appealed to the higher court. He insisted that his right to honour had been violated and hoped for a fair trial.
According to reports, on December 12, the First Court of Chengdu Railway Transport pronounced a verdict on the high-profile case of "man framed in the subway". The Court held that the two women did not constitute a violation of the general personality rights of the man in question, Mr. Ho. The court did not support Mr. He's request that Luo Moumou, Zeng Moumou (two women), and the Chengdu Metro Operating Company publish an apology statement, read out the apology statement at the subway station involved in the case for 10 consecutive days, and compensate a total of 50,000 yuan for economic losses and mental damages.
However, Mr. Ho was not satisfied with the result. He said that after discussing with lawyer **, he believed that the court of first instance found that the facts were unclear and the law was wrongly applied, so he decided to file an appeal. On the afternoon of the 12th, the reporter learned from Mr. He's ** lawyer that the second-instance lawsuit had been accepted.
On his personal Weibo, Mr. He posted the announcement of the verdict and a dispute over the right to reputation that occurred in a foreign country. He wrote, "You can hide behind your back, but don't laugh at a person who perseveres to the end, the light she has obtained will illuminate us sooner or later." These words not only show Mr. Ho's determination, but also his persistence and perseverance.
It is understood that Mr. He has been defending his rights to reputation and personal dignity. He firmly believed that he was not in the subway ** others, but was accused by two women for no reason. This incident had a great impact on his life and work, and he was also under great mental pressure as a result.
This appeal is another step in Mr. Ho's long journey to defend his rights. His lawyer said that they will go all out to fight for the legitimate rights and interests of their clients. They considered that there were some problems with the decision of the court of first instance and decided to appeal to the higher courts.
Mr. Ho's appeal has also received great attention from all walks of life. Many netizens expressed their support for Mr. Ho's activism and hoped that he would receive a fair trial. They considered Mr. Ho to be a victim and that his right to reputation and human dignity should be protected.
In addition, a number of legal experts have expressed support for Mr. Ho's appeal. They believe that the right to reputation is one of the fundamental rights of every human being and that no one should be framed without hard evidence. If there is a problem with the decision of the court of first instance, then an appeal is a normal legal procedure.
However, there are also some who have reservations about Mr. Ho's appeal. They argued that the case had already been decided by the court of first instance and that the parties should respect the court's decision. They fear that if each party is not satisfied with the first-instance verdict and appeals, then judicial resources will be wasted.
Regardless of the outcome, Mr. Ho's appeal has undoubtedly once again raised concerns about the right to reputation and the right to personal privacy. This incident reminds us that in the age of the Internet, individuals' right to reputation and privacy need to be more protected and respected. At the same time, we should also learn to look at online information rationally and not easily believe and spread unverified information.
We will continue to monitor the progress of this case and keep our readers updated in a timely manner. Let us look forward to a just and fair trial outcome and make a positive contribution to the maintenance of social justice and fairness.