Chengdu, December 28, 2023 – On November 3, the case of "Chengdu man framed in the subway", which attracted widespread attention, ushered in new developments. The client, Mr. He, did not recognize the first-instance judgment and submitted an appeal to the court on December 25, and the appeal case has now been accepted.
In an interview with Jiemian News, Mr. He said that he was deeply dissatisfied with the verdict of the court of first instance and believed that his general personality rights had been violated. The purpose of this appeal is to fight for a public apology and the right to pay for economic and moral damages to the two girls suspected of framing him and Chengdu Metro.
On November 3, the Chengdu Railway Transport First Court held a trial of the general personality rights dispute. As the plaintiff, Mr. He sued the two girls and Chengdu Metro, demanding a public apology from the court and compensation for economic and moral damages.
However, to Mr. He's disappointment, on December 12, the Chengdu Railway Transport No. 1 Court ruled after a trial that neither the two women nor the Chengdu Metro had infringed Mr. He's general personality rights. The court did not support Mr. He's request for compensation, nor did it support his claim that Luo Moumou, Zeng Moumou, and Chengdu Metro Operating Company publish an apology statement, read an apology statement at the subway station involved in the case for 10 consecutive days, and pay a total of 50,000 yuan for economic losses and mental damages.
Faced with the first-instance verdict, Mr. He expressed his dissatisfaction and decided to protect his rights and interests through legal means. In his appeal brief, he listed in detail the objections and reasons for the first-instance judgment and hoped that the Court of Appeal would conduct a fairer and more comprehensive hearing of the case.
The Chengdu Metro False Accusation Case has always attracted much attention. During the trial, Mr. Ho stressed his innocence and said he felt deeply aggrieved by the alleged conduct. The development of the case will further attract public attention, and the society will continue to pay attention to the outcome of the court's trial of the appeal case.
At the same time, Chengdu Metro Company's attitude towards the case has attracted much attention. After the first-instance judgment, Chengdu Metro Company did not express its position on whether it would continue to take legal action, but the company's response has been questioned by the society in the infringement case of being ** in public places.
The new year is approaching, and the outcome of Mr. Ho's appeal case will have a profound impact on the handling of similar cases in the future. In the social context of information disclosure and privacy protection, how to balance the public's right to know and the right to personal privacy has become an urgent legal issue for the society.
At present, the appeal case has been formally accepted, and the court will organize and carry out a trial in accordance with the law. The society will closely monitor the final outcome of this case, with a view to providing clearer legal guidance for similar disputes.