The winter test provoked public anger, and asked the Great Wall of Geely to fight back collectively

Mondo Entertainment Updated on 2024-01-29

Recently, the results of the 2023 "Winter Test" of Chedi have caused an uproar.

In the test of the endurance achievement rate of hybrid vehicles, BYD scored 85The 08% pure electric achievement rate won the first place, while the range achievement rate of other models was less than 35%, which is a huge gap.

However, some models do not have test data due to the inability to use pure electric mode in cold environments.

Such test results directly caused dissatisfaction among some car companies, and even caused them to be angry.

On December 9, BYD Yu Chengdong posted in the circle of friends that he understood the Chedi Winter Test "The test of pit people and mislead the people!".Science and rigor are the basic rules that should be followed!”。

At the same time, the official also gave the "evidence" that the winter test of the car emperor was not rigorous: before the test, the vehicle was heated by air conditioning for 71 minutes, and after the temperature in the car reached 24 degrees Celsius, it continued to heat for 40 minutes, and the vehicle power was only 749% of the time, and it is equipped with 4 60kg sandbags.

In response to the anger of the car company boss, the official Chedi responded on December 10, saying that the test standards are completely unified, and all models are treated equally, and the corresponding test standards are attached.

However, this move did not quell the anger of car companies.

On December 10, Great Wall Motors also raised questions and announced that it would hold a communication meeting on December 14 on the multiple test standards of the winter test of the car emperor.

At the same time, Yang Xueliang, senior vice president of Geely Holding Group, also issued an article saying that the "2023 Chedi Winter Test" is unscientific and unrigorous, and revealed the background data of the test vehicle, which raised Geely's doubts about the Chedi Winter Test.

This series of incidents has caused heated discussions on the Internet, some netizens said that the test of understanding the car emperor is not referenced, the professionalism is insufficient, and there is even an obvious suspicion of "recharge", but more netizens disagree with the anger of the car company bosses, thinking that they are "reasonable and justified if it is beneficial to themselves, and unscientific if it is unfavorable to themselves".

When you buy a car, do you often go to the ** review?

Of course, this is a very common phenomenon, but today we are going to discuss whether you can trust 100% of the best vehicle tests.

Recently, a test of knowing the car emperor has caused dissatisfaction among car companies.

In the test, the endurance performance of the M7 was at the bottom, which caused Yu Chengdong's anger, and the Great Wall also publicly questioned the Wei brand Blue Mountain in the test** The current charging is abnormal.

However, we don't want to say how "fragile" these car companies are, but to take a look: can the test data really be 100% trusted?First of all, we need to clearly understand that the test data of ** is just a reference for us.

As the article said, "Even if they have a perfect evaluation process for each test, whether these processes are scientific and rigorous, whether each item has been verified by relevant national standards, and whether the staff involved in the test have the relevant qualifications, no one can say for sure, and even the car emperor himself is not clear."

Secondly, we need to realize that it's more about traffic and click-through rates.

Although they will try their best to ensure the rigor of the test, in order to attract more readers, they will inevitably use some exaggerated techniques to make the article more engaging.

In this case, we need to be more judgmental and discerning when we read.

Finally, we need to be clear that whether a consumer will ultimately choose to buy a car model depends entirely on his needs and actual experience.

*The test data is just a reference, but the real experience is what matters.

In conclusion, the test data is not 100% reliable, and we need to be vigilant and discerning.

And car companies don't need to care too much about the results of the test, the truth will always be revealed to the world.

Related Pages