Shenyin s master servant contract contradicts itself, is it an assist artifact, or an obstacle to

Mondo Culture Updated on 2024-01-30

The male protagonist's ** Donghua Emperor deduced that the female protagonist Ah Yin was the death of the male protagonist Kuching, so he planted a "master-servant contract" on the two of them to protect Kuching.

The male protagonist is noble and can't die, but the female protagonist is the ...... he hitsThis kind of routine has been rotten on the street in the female frequency**, such as "Flower Thousand Bone".

However, this will not be discussed for now. Our focus today is to ** the paradoxical function of the "master-servant contract".

[Function 1]:The female protagonist can't have bad thoughts about the male protagonist, including but not limited to: shark man, trickery, and falling in love with the male protagonist.

Key points: The "master-servant contract" can prevent the female protagonist from falling in love with the male protagonist.

There is one point here that is very confusing - the anti-addiction function of the "master-servant contract" is only effective for the female protagonist, not for the male protagonist.

That is: the female protagonist cannot love the male protagonist, but the male protagonist can love the female protagonist.

What do you think?Donghua, you come out!I'm going to cut open your brain and see your brain circuits!)

[Function 2]:The female protagonist cannot leave the distance of the male protagonist xx meters.

Key points: The female protagonist must be inseparable from the male protagonist.

It can be seen from this that the "master-servant contract" has the role of divine assistance, which can force the male and female protagonists to fall in love for a long time.

[Function 3]:The female protagonist must be responsive to the male protagonist's needs.

Key points: This is the only function that meets the definition of "master and servant" among the many functions of the "master-servant contract".

To sum up, it can be seen that the [function 1] and [function 2] of the "master-servant contract" contradict each other!

1. If Donghua is afraid that the male and female protagonists will fall in love with each other, then they should set a "separation distance", that is: the female protagonistCan't get closeThe distance of the male protagonist xx meters. And it shouldn't be: the heroineCan't leaveThe distance of the male protagonist xx meters.

Second, if Donghua wants the male and female protagonists to fall in love with each other and use true love to resolve the catastrophe, the heroine should not be restricted, so that she can't take the initiative with the man, and she will be punished by the "master-servant contract" as soon as she is tempted.

So, does Donghua want the male and female protagonists to fall in love, or is he afraid that the male and female protagonists will fall in love?Is this "master-servant contract" an artifact of love, or an obstacle to love?

I don't know if this logic bug is the pot of the original book or the pot of the screenwriter?

Autumn and Winter Check-in Challenge

Related Pages