Text |Auto core balls.
Author |Li Xin.
Recently, the 2023 Chedi Winter Test has sparked heated discussions, and Huawei's Yu Chengdong angrily scolded in the circle of friends after reading the content: "The test of the pit people!."Science and rigor are the basic rules that should be followed!The two exclamation marks are enough to explain Huawei's attitude towards this time.
Yu Chengdong angrily understood the truth behind Emperor Che. The key problem lies in the "pure electric battery life achievement rate of plug-in hybrid group" tested by Chedi, of which the pure electric battery life achievement rate of the M7 is only 3160%, which is actually the first from the bottom. This may be the reason why Yu Chengdong is angry.
AITO Auto officially accused the car emperor of human manipulation before the test, including long-term air conditioning and heating, opening and closing doors, windows and other operations, resulting in distorted test results.
In addition, Great Wall Motor, Geely and other parties have questioned the rules of understanding the winter test of Chedi. The company responded that this test was a full-load endurance test in extremely cold weather below -20°C, and all participating vehicles set off in formation after maintenance, using a unified standard, in line with the user's winter car scene, and there was no discrimination.
In Autocore's view, regardless of the fact of which is right or wrongUnderstand the focus of the debate between the car emperor and the car company, which is nothing more than what is the standard of new energy vehicle testingAt present, the industry lacks a unified standard for new energy vehicle testing.
Yu Chengdong was "unconvinced".
Recently, the "2023 Winter Test" was released, which tested the pure electric range achievement rate of hybrid models in severe cold conditions, and about 20 models participated in the test. Among them, BYD looked up to 85The 08% endurance achievement rate ranks first, and the M7 extended range version of the Wenjie is 31The 6% range achievement rate ranks first from the bottom. As soon as the results were announced, there was an "uproar" in the outside world.
On the evening of December 8th, AITO Automobile's official Weibo urgently released "Fearless of the Cold, the Official Interpretation of the Winter Test Performance of the Wenjie Series Models", in response to the fact that the new M7 of Wenjie ranked at the bottom of the pure electric range achievement rate of the plug-in hybrid group in a ** winter test.
As mentioned in the original article, the results of the "Unified WLTC4 Standard Pure Electric Range Achievement Rate of Plug-in Hybrid Group" published in the ** show that the pure electric range of the new M7 is 553 km. AITO said that after testing**, it was confirmed that the vehicle was heated by air conditioning for a total of 71 minutes before the official test, and after the temperature in the car reached 24 degrees Celsius, it continued to heat for another 40 minutes.
In this process, there are more than ten times to open and close the doors and windows, the longest of which is more than 3 minutes, which greatly increases the energy consumption of the air conditioner and leads to a rapid drop in power. Under the extreme cold and continuous heating conditions of the air conditioner, the windows and doors are opened for a long time many times, which seriously deviates from the user's real usage scenario.
In addition, the battery in the vehicle is only 749%, with the driver and 4 60kg sandbags on board, the test will start until the battery level is 20At 4%, the range extender starts to start, and the actual battery power is consumed by 545%。
In the face of doubts, on the afternoon of December 9, Chedi responded in the live broadcast that the endurance test standards of all vehicles in this winter test are the same, and they will not be aimed at a certain model.
Huawei's Yu Chengdong was obviously dissatisfied with the test results, and posted: "The test of pit people misleads the people!."Science and rigor are the basic rules that should be followed!”
In addition, Yang Xueliang, senior vice president of Geely Holding Group, also publicly stated on social platforms, "I do not agree with the evaluation results of the pure electric range achievement rate of hybrid models released by the "2023 Winter Test" released by Chedi, and think that such an evaluation process is unscientific, not rigorous, and the conclusion is not convincing." ”
In addition, netizens also fried the pot. Some netizens are skeptical about the credibility of the test.
This understanding king means: Mr. Yu, it's time to pay the protection fee, otherwise next time it will be the penultimate ......”
How can there be new energy vehicles minus 20 degrees and the achievement rate is 8508% of ?It's so embarrassing and defies common sense!Most of the comments in the industry understand the doubts of the above-mentioned car companies, after all, this set of data is really unconvincing, and even deviates from common sense.
Whether from the perspective of car manufacturers or consumers, the results of this evaluation are really "one stone stirs up a thousand waves." ”
Calls for new standards
The winter test project of Chedi includes not only low-temperature charging, ice and snow climbing, measured battery life and other test items around the three-electric system, but also ACC braking, intelligent vehicle machine and other intelligent level tests.
The key point of this test that aroused doubts from automobile manufacturers is that although the car emperor explained in ** that it was "fully charged and fully fueled" and left to stand overnight, and "carried out power-on maintenance at the same time", however, each manufacturer found that there was no unified standard according to its own network data.
According to the comprehensive public information of AITO Automobile's official WeChat, Geely Automobile and Great Wall Motor, there are differences in the idling time and number of door openings of the three car companies. For example, before the official test, the vehicle underwent a total of 71 minutes of air conditioning and heating, and opened and closed the doors and windows more than 10 times, the longest of which was more than 3 minutes. “
The Geely Galaxy L6 vehicle idled in place for 70 minutes, during which the door was opened 4 times, and the longest two doors were opened for more than 10 minutesThe Lynk & Co 08 was idle in place for 71 minutes before the test, during which the doors were opened six times, with the longest opening time being 6 minutes and 39 seconds.
Great Wall Motors turns on the high voltage and turns on the air conditioning for maintenance, which lasts from 60 to 72 minutes, and at the same time, each model has more than ten times to open and close the door and open the window, and some models have opened the seat heating.
AITO questioned that under the extreme cold and continuous heating conditions of the air conditioner, the windows and doors were opened for a long time many times, which seriously deviated from the real usage scenarios of users. At the same time, Yang Xueliang also said on Weibo: "These operations have greatly increased the energy consumption of air conditioning, resulting in a lot of power drops before the vehicle is officially issued." ”
After Yu Chengdong publicly angrily criticized Emperor Che, the Great Wall also had a new move. On December 11, Great Wall Motor also announced that it would hold a "Communication Meeting on the Questioning of the Winter Test Standard of the Car Emperor", covering the scientific and fair standards of the new energy winter test, the vehicle maintenance standard of the pure electric range test, the vehicle power standard of the climbing angle test, and the vehicle braking standard of the climbing distance test.
Interestingly, the Great Wall didn't wait for the press conference, only 6 hours after the official announcement, it immediately explained the abnormal data of the car emperor, and shouted to the car circle: jointly build China's new energy high-quality test standards!
In the face of doubts, although the car emperor responded, the car companies did not pay. At this stage, between the car emperor and the car company, there are different opinions, and the results of the first winter test have become confusing.
It is worth noting that the auto core ball saw the ** number of "car intelligence" a** approximate content, Mr. Yang Honghai said: "It is very interesting to understand the operation of the car emperor this time, Kia EV6 electric supercar signed up for this winter test, but was rejected by the car emperor and told that he was not allowed to participate in the competition, but was rejected, and the truth behind it became more and more confusing." ”
This time, I understand the evaluation data and content of Chedi, and there are places recognized by car companies, and more places where car companies do not recognize the results and details. Behind the incident between car companies and car emperors, there is more of a debate about measuring the test standards of new energy vehicles.
Is this review authoritative?
Automobile evaluation is usually carried out by automobiles**, professional institutions or automobile manufacturers, and laboratory tests, road tests, safety tests, etc. are carried out on the vehicle, and the appearance, interior, handling, power, economy, safety and other aspects of the vehicle are evaluated and compared. As a consumer, should you believe in this evaluation of Chedi?
Auto Core Ball saw the new ** account "Speed Anhui Peak" in an article mentioning the authoritative evaluation of the car emperor. "It is doubtful whether Chedi has the right to evaluate as a commercial platform. Even if the assessment is completed in doubt, whether there is a professional and authoritative third-party supervision and evaluation process to ensure that the whole process is accurate and fair. It can also be seen from the current controversy between car companies and car emperors that the process has not been effectively supervised by other parties. How can the authenticity of this result be guaranteed?”
As a leading platform in the automotive field, if it is truly fair, to a certain extent, although it is not authoritative, it is also a data that can be referred. It is also the basis and standard that consumers can refer to when buying a car. However, because the detection itself is associated with huge benefits, it is easy for the car review platform to lose its original intention in the development process.
The Yao Eighteen Incident" is a good example. Previously, the car with nearly 1.4 million fans was released from the "Great Qin Army Shaanxi Tuan", saying that the high-speed fuel consumption of the BYD Formula Leopard car reached 18 liters per 100 kilometers, which was far from the official propaganda and caused huge controversy on the Internet.
Subsequently, Formula Leopard officially responded that the vehicle had a large number of abnormal driving behaviors that day, including speeding, abnormal parking, etc. Both sides insisted on their own words, and only provided the most beneficial vehicle driving data for themselves. In the end, the "Shaanxi Regiment of the Great Qin Army" apologized and was taken off the shelves.
Auto Xinqiu saw an article in the "Red Star Capital Bureau" that wrote: "Car evaluation has a strong inflammatory nature, which can affect consumer decision-making and even the reputation of the product. Therefore, it is very important to be scientific, objective and impartial in car evaluation, and to avoid being affected by commercial interests and personal biases. Automobile** is not an authoritative evaluation agency, the test standards and methods are not necessarily completely scientific, and there are commercial interests with car companies, and the evaluation results are often controversial. “
It is worth thinking that the current new energy vehicle market has not formed a unified test standard at all. **Comparative testing from a third-party perspective to provide consumers with a reference for buying and choosing a car, to a certain extent, is conducive to promoting the progress of the new energy industry and the popularization of new energy consumption.
In the process of winter testing, it is important to have authority, objectivity and impartiality in the test. Otherwise, the results of the winter test will make consumers question new energy. We believe that after this collision, consumers will know more about cars and people. We wait for further developments in this event!
All of this article is on the Internet.
Focus on smart cars to help make key decisions.