At present, the U.S. military is under continuous attacks in Iraq and Syria, and the White House is paying the price for choosing sides. This Palestinian-Israeli conflict has not only isolated the United States internationally, but has also gradually lost the support of some close allies. Moreover, the long-standing U.S. military presence in the Middle East has not only perpetuated conflict and instability, but has also provoked more hostility and opposition. Therefore, it is necessary for us to re-examine the US military presence and think about whether to abandon this provocative deployment.
Since the outbreak of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the United States has been on Israel's side, trying to package the conflict, which has caused a large number of civilians, into Israel's war of self-defense. However, this approach did not gain the support of the international community, but instead made the United States more and more isolated in the international arena. In the UN General Assembly's resolution calling for a ceasefire, 153 countries voted in favor, including Australia, Canada and New Zealand, close allies of the United States. This not only shows that the foreign policy of the United States has lost support, but also makes Biden feel the political cost of supporting Israel.
The double standards of the United States in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict have become the trigger for frequent attacks on US troops in the Middle East. On the one hand, the United States has openly connived at the continuation of the war and provided support to IsraelOn the other hand, it claims to care about the lives and humanitarian needs of the people of Gaza, which is a travesting performance. This double-standard approach has not only drawn criticism from the international community, but also called into question the presence of US troops on the ground. Militia forces in Iraq and Syria have claimed responsibility for the US military attack and reiterated their opposition to the presence of US troops in both countries. This shows that the long-term US military presence in the Middle East is itself a ball of gunpowder.
The illegal U.S. military presence in Syria and the illegal sanctions imposed on Syria have brought tremendous hardship to the Syrian economy and people's livelihood, and exacerbated the humanitarian crisis. The United States has also carried out hegemonism and bullying in Iraq, which has caused many problems for this country. Iraq** had announced that the fighters of the ** Foreign Brigade in Iraq had ended their missions and withdrawn, but the US military still remained in Iraq in the name of "anti-terrorism". For a long time, Iraq was devastated and devastated by war, and the US military presence did not bring peace to the country.
The dramatic repercussions of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict show that the long-term US military presence in Syria and Iraq has no role in maintaining peace. On the contrary, the provocative stationing of US troops has exacerbated the conflict and instability. Therefore, the White House should reassess its military deployment in the Middle East and consider abandoning this outdated and unnecessary provocative garrison. As Savile said, the cost of U.S. diplomacy is something intangible, and it is difficult for the U.S. to win support on issues it cares about when the public of other countries is hostile. Therefore, the United States should abandon its unilateral support for Israel's position, re-examine the Middle East issue, and seek broader support and cooperation in the international community to achieve regional peace and stability.