Where does the illegal income of village cadres come from?A village cadre's self-report revealed an unexpected inside story
* Village-level administrative openness.
The villagers don't believe them, because the village administration was not transparent enough in the past, so the current situation is very chaotic and the income and expenditure are not clear. As a result, there are many problems and suspicious places, and some people even think that there is a suspicion of *** in this. At present, however, rural governance is completely different. Standardized laws and regulations and management systems make village-level property rights clear and rights and responsibilities clear. However, some village committees and committees have dragged their feet in handling their work, and they have not informed the masses of the specific situation and procedures after the work is completed, nor have they disclosed the information, resulting in many misunderstandings.
Openness and transparency are important ways to ensure village-level governance. Peasants have the right to know the operating procedures of the village administration and to know the actual situation of the village, so as to realize the supervision and participation of the village. We must dare to make public the problems raised by the villagers to the masses, and we must dare to be open and honest about the problems raised by the masses and clarify misunderstandings. Only in this way can the villagers feel the benefits of "transparency" and build confidence in them.
Individual party members and cadres have selfish interests.
Some township and town cadres have certain personal interests in their work, and they want to seek personal interests through their work. However, under the current rural governance system, it is difficult for the villagers to satisfy their "selfish desires". The current management system is to follow certain principles in rural work and carry out various systems to the end; only in this way can we put an end to economic loopholes, and we will not be able to seek personal interests for a very small number of village cadres. Everyone in the village knows this.
The emergence of the problem of selfishness is dangerous to a certain extent, but according to the current management system, as long as the village management is strictly carried out and the villagers are self-governed, the phenomenon of individual self-interest can be well eliminated. As supervisors, we must always pay attention to their words and deeds, and be able to truthfully report the problems they find, so that they have no chance.
Some questions about the current change of term of office of the villagers' committee.
If some malpractices and problems arise in the course of the change of office of the village-level organizations, it is possible to bring some morally flawed people who have no political bottom line into the leadership groups. However, as the secretary of the grassroots party organization who oversees the election process, he should assume full responsibility to ensure that the election is conducted in a fair and orderly manner. Judging from the relevant policies of various localities, the secretaries of township and town party committees shoulder a heavy responsibility in the selection of village-level autonomous organizations, and they must be cautious in every election to ensure that the elected village cadres meet the requirements, have good moral character, and have no selfish motives. As a result, the likelihood of electing unqualified or defective village cadres is low. Even if one person escapes the catastrophe, the villagers will quickly find out and clear the village party branch.
Abstract:The survey results show that the fundamental factors that cause the distrust of village cadres are: lack of transparency in rural governance, selfishness of individual village cadres, and wrong elections. However, under the current rural governance system in China, the "transparent" governance model has been greatly improved, and the phenomenon of "personal self-interest" is difficult to occur. Therefore, at present, the phenomenon of "gray income" among rural grassroots cadres is very rare, and it can even be said that there is none. In rural areas, in order to prevent illegal acts, it is first necessary to raise awareness, identify problems, and report them to the relevant agencies in a timely manner. Only under the joint action of the village will the governance of the village become fair and open, so as to win the trust of the villagers.
Introduction: (500 words).
The illegal gains of rural cadres are a problem in the minds of the vast number of peasants at present, and they are also an important factor affecting the interests of the broad masses of the people. However, we cannot deny that the villagers' committee is elected by the people of the whole village, and they are the most trusted and trustworthy. Why do the villagers be skeptical of their leading cadres?Once, I was chatting with a villager in the village, and he told me that there were three main reasons.
First, in the past, rural governance was not transparent enough, and it was easy to misunderstand. In the past, the village governance system was not strict enough, resulting in some chaos in village affairs and problems such as unclear accounts. At the same time, it also makes rural residents more suspicious of the members of the two village committees, misappropriation and other issues. However, today's rural governance is very different from the past, with clearer laws and regulations, more standardized administrative work, and a clearer division of responsibilities. Through an open and transparent way, villagers can have a clearer understanding, supervision and participation in the governance of the village. Members of rural collective economic organizations should be informed of their financial situation and relevant circumstances so as to clarify their misgivings and reduce misunderstandings.
Second, some township and town cadres have the phenomenon of "personal interests." Some township and town cadres seek personal interests for their own selfish interests in their work. However, under the existing rural administrative system, the "private interests" of the villagers cannot be realized. Only by adhering to the principles and strictly implementing the system can we put an end to financial loopholes and fail to realize personal interests. At the same time, it is also necessary to pay attention to the words and deeds of party members and cadres, and be able to find problems and prevent the phenomenon of personal self-interest.
Third, there have been some irregularities in the re-election of village-level organizations. Some problems that have arisen in the re-election of village-level organizations will cause some people who are morally corrupt and whose political bottom line is not high to be elected to leading posts. However, each election must be closely monitored by the secretary of the village party branch to ensure that the election process is fair and standardized. Even if village cadres who do not meet the requirements are produced, they can be quickly eliminated through the supervision of the masses of the people.
Generally speaking, in the current rural administrative system, the phenomenon of "gray income" of village cadres is very rare, or even non-existent. At present, the governance of rural areas is very strict, which is very different from before, and it is not easy to appear ** phenomenon. If such problems occur, they can be resolved in a timely and fair manner. However, in order to do this, it is necessary to raise awareness, to have problems, and to have a response, so that there is nowhere to hide from such illegal behaviors. What are your opinions on this issue, you can exchange and ** in the comments below.