The political conspiracy behind the mystery is revealed by the internal strife in the Taiping Heavens.
During the 14-year existence of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the Tianjing Incident became one of the most striking scenes. There are different opinions, but the mainstream view attributed its fuse to the conspiracy of Yang Xiuqing, the king of the east, to "force the seal to live long live", which intensified the contradiction between Hong and Yang. However, the truth of history is often hidden in the fog, and we need to peel through the layers of fog, look for the remaining clues, and strive to restore the original appearance of history.
First of all, we need to understand the "possession of the gods", which is unique to the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. It began with Yang Xiuqing, the king of the East, who was inspired by Hong Xiuquan's "dream" apparition in 1847, combined with the witchcraft of descending children, and pretended to be possessed by the "Heavenly Father" for the first time. This created the conditions for the later "long live the forced seal".
In 1853, the Taiping army conquered Jiangning, renamed Tianjing and established the capital. The Heavenly King Hong Xiuquan was obsessed with enjoying the fruits of the revolution and ignored the government affairs, while the Eastern King Yang Xiuqing became the actual controller. In 1856, the Taiping army broke through the military stronghold of the Qing army, and its momentum climbed to its peak. At this time, Yang Xiuqing believed that he had made outstanding contributions, and was not satisfied with the title of "nine thousand years old", and with the help of the mouth of "Heavenly Father", he forced Hong Xiuquan to "reward" him with the title of "Long Live Title".
The statement about "long live the forced seal" was first seen in "Jinling Province Difficult Notes", but the author is an ordinary citizen of Nanjing, and it is impossible to get in touch with the insider. Another record, "The Collection of Thieves' Affairs", although it is an official record of the Hunan army, does not directly involve the matter of "forced sealing".
Li Xiucheng, a general of the Taiping Army, did not personally experience the incident, and his conclusions were mostly subjective fabrications. Although these accounts have names and surnames, their authenticity is still questionable.
After the Tianjing Incident, Hong Xiuquan not only restored Yang Xiuqing's reputation, but also succeeded his son Hong Tianyou to Yang Xiuqing and named him the King of Youdong. This contradicts the statement of "long live the forced seal" and raises questions.
If the "forced seal" is indeed true, why did Hong Xiuquan restore Yang Xiuqing's reputation and even pass on his youngest son to him?It doesn't make logical sense.
Perhaps, "Long live the forced seal" is just a political rumor spread by Hong Xiuquan to achieve his personal goals. In the conflict between power and oracles, Hong Xiuquan may need to weave mysterious stories to maintain his position as a leader.
The "Long Live the Forced Seal" incident in the Taiping civil strife may not be a historical truth, but a story hidden in the conspiracy and lies. History is like a fog, and we need to dig deep and try to restore the true face of that period buried by time.
Through the in-depth analysis of this article, the "Long Live the Forced Seal" incident of the Taiping Heavenly Civil Strife shows the complexity of historical research and the difficulty of the authenticity of the record. On the basis of in-depth analysis of the various doubts and counter-evidences behind the incident, we can have a deeper reflection on this period of history.
First of all, through the examination of historical materials, the article clearly points out the limitations and political colors of "Jinling Province Difficult Notes" and "Thieves' Symbiography". The author successfully presents the positions and perspectives of these two historical documents in front of readers, reminding us to maintain dialectical thinking when accepting historical records, and to beware of one-sided entanglement. This is crucial for the study of history, because each historical accountant may be influenced by his or her own position and the influence of the times, which leads to a certain degree of subjectivity and bias in their narrative.
Secondly, through the analysis of Li Xiucheng's self-report, the article cleverly points out that he is not an eyewitness to the incident, and his conclusions may be subjective. This view reminds readers of the importance of personal experience when evaluating historical narratives, because only those who have witnessed them can truly restore the ins and outs of events. This also reveals to some extent the difficulty of historical research, especially when faced with events involving political intrigue.
As for the authenticity of the "Long Live the Forced Seal" incident, the article raises reasonable doubts through counter-evidence and logical reasoning, and challenges the credibility of this statement. This kind of in-depth excavation of historical truth shows the critical thinking and rigorous logical ability that historians need to have when interpreting history. History is not just a pile of records, but also a scientific exploration that needs to restore the truth through scrutiny, comparison and counter-evidence.
Finally, the article discusses the possibility of Hong Xiuquan fabricating lies by talking about the possible motives behind it. This perspective provides deep historical insight, highlighting the personal motivations and political needs that may exist in the dissemination of information by historical narrators. History is not an immutable fact, but a complex system influenced by the background of time and space and the subjective will of the parties involved.
Overall, this article successfully demonstrates the multi-layered and complex nature of historical research through an in-depth analysis of the "Long Live the Forced Closure" incident. Through a comprehensive examination of historical data, personal experience and logic, readers can gain an in-depth understanding of the methods of historical research and the multifaceted nature of historical events. This has positive educational significance for improving readers' historical literacy and deepening their understanding of historical truth.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!