The recent visit of Biden to Saudi Arabia has become the focus of attention, and the dispute with Saudi Crown Prince Salman on human rights issues has once again sparked heated discussions. The focus stems from the 2018 Khashoggi case, in which the Saudi crown prince was accused of being the mastermind. Biden's handling has been controversial, in contrast to the embarrassment of the Trump years, but Biden's position on human rights has been challenged similarly.
Round 1: Visit Saudi Arabia, Biden must not die well?
Biden faced his first predicament, and unlike Trump, he vowed to place Saudi Arabia on an international "pariah" during the campaign. Biden was originally reluctant to visit in person, trying to solve the problem of oil production capacity by **, but was politely rejected by Saudi Arabia. In order to maintain US-Saudi relations, Biden made a bold visit to Saudi Arabia, but lost a game because of this, exposing the contradictions of the United States on human rights issues.
Second round: The fist fight, why did Biden lose?
Biden decided to fist with Salman, but the results were jaw-dropping. Instead of shaking hands with Salman, they instead bumped fists, which were meant to show a tough stance on human rights issues, but were criticized in Western etiquette. The Washington Post publisher called it "too shameful," a move that was seen as a major departure from diplomatic etiquette and put Biden in an embarrassing position.
Round 3: Interview alone, why did Biden change course?
Biden had planned to avoid a private interview with Salman, but in the end he changed course. Salman, as the de facto ruler, will get nothing out of Biden not to interview him. In order to protect the interests of the United States, Biden finally chose to meet Salman alone, although this decision also cost him another game.
Round 4: Why did Biden repeatedly lose points in human rights negotiations?
Biden defended himself after a closed-door meeting with Salman, saying that he bluntly demanded an investigation into the Khashoggi case. However, Salman fought back with the "Abu Ghraib prison incident" in American history, making it difficult for Biden to deal with. The Saudi crown prince skillfully shifted the focus to the stain on the United States on human rights, successfully defending himself, and Biden once again lost points.
Overall, Biden's visit to Saudi Arabia has repeatedly lost points on human rights issues, and it has not changed the U.S. strategy toward Saudi Arabia compared to the Trump era. The human rights turmoil has aroused international concern, Biden**'s performance on this issue has been questioned, and what will happen to the future of US-Saudi relations is still a mystery to be solved on the international stage.
Biden's visit to Saudi Arabia has aroused widespread concern and heated discussions, especially on the issue of human rights, and the fist-to-fist confrontation with Saudi Crown Prince Salman has become the focus. This series of controversial incidents has made people think deeply about the US position on handling international affairs and human rights issues.
First, Biden is in a dilemma when dealing with human rights in Saudi Arabia. In contrast to the Trump era, Trump has taken a pragmatic approach and has not investigated the Khashoggi case in depth in order to preserve the U.S.-Saudi relationship. However, Biden has taken a tougher stance on the issue, trying to express his concern about human rights issues by not shaking hands with Salman. However, this approach has been criticized by diplomatic etiquette, putting Biden in an embarrassing position.
Second, Biden's remarks during his visit to Saudi Arabia have demonstrated the consistent position of the United States on the issue of human rights. Although Biden stressed the need to investigate the Khashoggi case, at the same time, Saudi Crown Prince Salman countered with the "Abu Ghraib prison incident" in US history. This recriminatory situation reflects the common phenomenon of power games and mutual attacks in international politics. The way the United States handled some human rights issues in the past has also become a bargaining chip for Saudi Arabia to fight back, making Biden passive during his visit to Saudi Arabia.
In addition, Biden**'s position has also been questioned by the international community. Human rights issues have always been one of the focuses of the international community, and Biden**'s tough stance during his visit to Saudi Arabia has aroused international concern. This also reflects the expectations of the international community on the responsibilities and obligations that major countries should assume in dealing with human rights issues. As a major player in the international arena, the United States' stance on the human rights issue will inevitably arouse widespread repercussions and discussions.
Finally, Biden's actions during his visit to Saudi Arabia have also triggered speculation about the future direction of US-Saudi relations. Although Biden has tried to express his concern about human rights issues through a tough stance, at the same time, he has had to adopt a compromise attitude in order to maintain the US-Saudi relationship. This dilemma makes the U.S.-Saudi relationship complex and sensitive on human rights issues, and there are still many uncertainties about the future development of the relationship between the two countries.
Overall, the human rights controversy over Biden's visit to Saudi Arabia reflects the complexity of international politics and the power struggle between major powers. The position and handling of international affairs by the United States have a direct bearing on the international community's trust and expectations for human rights and justice. In the future, we will continue to focus on the development of the U.S.-Saudi relationship and the role and responsibilities of the United States in the international arena.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!