The integration of three governance improves the efficiency of grassroots social governance

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-30

Original title: The integration of "three governance" improves the efficiency of grassroots social governance.

Social governance is an important aspect of national governance, and improving the level of grassroots social governance is an important foundation for promoting the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity. **The general secretary pointed out: "If the grassroots are strong, the country will be strong, and if the grassroots are safe, the world will be safe, and we must do a good job in the basic work of modernizing grassroots governance." The "Resolution of the Communist Party of China on the Major Achievements and Historical Experience of the Party's Centennial Struggle" pointed out that it is necessary to improve the urban and rural grassroots governance system that combines autonomy, rule of law, and rule by virtue under the leadership of the party organization, promote the focus of social governance to the grassroots level, build a social governance system of co-construction, co-governance and sharing, and build a social governance community where everyone is responsible, everyone is responsible, and everyone enjoys. The combination of autonomy, rule of law, and rule of ethics under the leadership of the Communist Party of China is an innovative practice of China's grassroots governance theory, and a concrete embodiment of the path of socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics in the field of grassroots social governance. The integration of "three governances" is the basic model of urban and rural grassroots social governance, which plays an important role in resolving social contradictions at the grassroots level and maintaining social order.

As an underdeveloped multi-ethnic province in the southwest borderland, Yunnan has been affected by the impact of modernization and population outflow, and the fierce collision of traditional culture, ethnic culture and modern culture has brought great challenges to the original marriage and family relations, and marital and family conflicts and disputes and juvenile problems have been increasing. In this regard, on the basis of fully practicing the "urban and rural grassroots governance system that combines autonomy, rule of law, and rule by virtue under the leadership of party organizations", Yunnan has moved the port of rule of law forward, highlighted in the front, and absorbed the power of autonomy and rule by virtue to deal with grassroots social contradictions and disputes, and at the same time promoted the transformation and development of autonomy and rule by virtue, and improved the efficiency of grassroots social governance with the "three governance" integration model of rule of law.

The pre-emptive rule of law means that the rule of law organs persist in moving the service window forward, practice the mass line, and shorten the distance between the masses and the rule of law. Through the establishment of "Fengqiao-style" public security police stations and "Fengqiao-style" people's courts, police offices and people's courtrooms have been built at the doorsteps of the masses, integrated into the daily lives of the masses, and services have been delivered to the doors, which has not only narrowed the distance between the masses and the police stations and people's courts, but also narrowed the psychological distance between the masses and the rule of law. The Nujiang ex-situ poverty alleviation and resettlement community not only builds the police office in the community, but also uses the grid management of the public security department to fully absorb the community people as grassroots grid members, further narrowing the distance with the masses, and is more conducive to the recognition of the rule of law organs by the masses, and taking the initiative to use the rule of law mechanism when conflicts occur, so as to avoid the disorderly development and fermentation of social contradictions.

The pre-emptive rule of law is to move the port of the rule of law mechanism forward, take the initiative to serve, and promote the resolution of the source of contradictions and disputes among the masses. The people's courts have strengthened the governance of the source of litigation, analyzing and judging the litigation case as soon as it receives a request, actively absorbing resources for autonomy and rule by virtue to promote the resolution of contradictions and disputes at the source, opening both the "legal knot" and the "heart knot", preventing social relations from being torn apart by a piece of litigation, and promoting the realization of long-term harmony in social relations after the case is concluded. The judicial departments and community and village groups give full play to the role of people's mediation as the "first line of defense", thoroughly investigate the daily contradictions and disputes between the masses, and strive to resolve the contradictions on the front line. For example, the Yuxi Chengjiang Judicial Office not only pays close attention to the changes in the state of the helpers, but also goes into the hearts of the helpers and educators with heart and affection, and helps the helpers cope with the difficulties of marriage and family from the source to avoid the occurrence of criminal cases.

The rule of law must be combined with the mechanism of autonomy and rule by virtue. The combination of the rule of law with autonomy and rule by virtue can more effectively resolve contradictions and disputes among the masses, repair social relations at the grassroots level, and restore social order. The contradictions and disputes between the masses at the grassroots level are often intertwined with emotion and reason, and between emotion and profit, and even emotion is greater than reason and benefit. Local governments not only understand the history and background of conflicts and disputes, the past and character of the parties, but also have the social capital available to resolve disputes, and can provide more appropriate solutions that will help to settle the case and restore the social order of the local government for a longer time. The rule of virtue mechanism can not only use the system of daily discourse and subtle values to translate rigid legal provisions into the daily language that the masses can understand, but also grasp the cultural and moral resources available to resolve disputes. Therefore, the rule of law preemptively absorbs the mechanism of autonomy and rule by virtue to participate in the resolution of contradictions and disputes, which is more conducive to the restoration of social order at the grassroots level.

The combination of the rule of law and the mechanism of autonomy and rule by virtue can also promote the modernization and transformation of autonomy and rule by virtue. Behind many contradictions and disputes is the disturbance and impact of rapid social development on the original behavioral norms and values of grassroots society. This kind of disturbance and impact itself reflects the limitations and helplessness of the endogenous social norms of autonomy and traditional rule of virtue in the period of social transformation. The rule of law reflects the most advanced modern social culture and is based on the interests of the entire country and nation, so as to avoid the cultural fixation of the traditional rule of virtue mechanism and the narrowness of the vision of local governments. While allowing the mechanism of autonomy and rule of virtue to participate in the resolution of contradictions and disputes, the rule of law can leverage the change of endogenous social norms, reverse the original cultural and behavioral norms that are no longer in line with the social development of the new era, and promote the modernization and transformation of autonomy and rule of virtue norms.

Wu Yunmei, the author is a researcher at the Yunnan Academy of Social Sciences).

*:Yunnan**.

Related Pages