The agreement between Israel and Hamas to extend the ceasefire in Gaza is heartening news. The conclusion of this agreement reflects a number of important elements. First, Palestine and Israel have compromised in the face of enormous pressure. Israel, in particular, despite its desire to resolve the issue through heavy-handed means, has practical difficulties that cannot be ignored.
For example, Israel and the United States are still holding hostages by Hamas, and the hostage exchange has not fully solved this dilemma. The Hamas organization will not easily release the hostages of Israel and the United States, and the chips in their hands will not be easily given up.
Second, the concerted efforts of the international community and widespread condemnation have made the United States and Israel realize that their military threats are no longer as effective as they once were. In addition to the Palestinians swearing to defend their homeland, the BRICS platform of China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran and other countries, as well as the unity of the entire Arab and Islamic world, have also put tremendous pressure on the two countries.
In this case, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must rethink their strategy and tactics. During the ceasefire, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been prepared at both the military and political levels, flexibly adjusting the previous strategy and tactics. However, there are still doubts about the possibility of lasting peace in Gaza. Why?
Next, we will analyze Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's thinking in the context of his recent specific deployments and actions. According to reports from Israel and the United States, there are at least two things that deserve attention in Israel during the ceasefire.
First, Israel invited Elon Musk, president of Tesla, to visit, and then US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also embarked on his third trip to the Middle East. Israel's strategic change is not only due to internal military considerations, but also due to international influences.
They now want to change the image of the negative effects of the past military campaign slogan "Operation Crush" by presenting military action as a "just operation" to free hostages, thereby reducing international pressure and moral condemnation. This ceasefire is not only a military break, but also a full preparation for the international community.
Israel has clearly felt the power of Western social networking in Musk's hands, and his attitude will affect the direction of the entire United States and the West. Through this series of operations, Netanyahu is trying to change the image of the international community about them, so as to be more decisive in future military operations.
Netanyahu's strategy of "retreating as advancing" is clearly correct. In addition to this, reports from Israel** have also attracted a lot of attention. According to reports, the head of Israeli military intelligence, Haliwa, could be dismissed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Previously, it was reported that before the Hamas group attacked Israel, Egypt** had obtained relevant information and conveyed it to the US intelligence service and the Israeli side, but Israel did not take action. This has sparked speculation, including that Netanyahu may have orchestrated the clash in retaliation against Hamas.
Another possibility is that Hawali underestimated Hamas's strength, leading to a runaway situation. Or maybe it's a bit of both. According to Hawali, he has been excluded from the recent wartime cabinet meeting held in Israel, suggesting that Netanyahu may be ready to be relieved of his duties in order to deflect the pressure.
This news means that if the United States cannot withstand the pressure from China, Russia and the Arab Islamic world, Israel may have to cease fire, and Hawali will be the scapegoat. The recent continuation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the US-Russian bargain over the conflict and ceasefire have shown that a military solution to the Gaza problem is no longer viable.
So, where will the conflict go in the future?Will it continue or will it move towards peace?Let's wait and see!Netanyahu** has been trying to solve the problem in Gaza through military means, but the reality shows that this method no longer works.
The recent private dealings between the United States and Russia also suggest that the international community has begun to seek other solutions. [Where is the future heading?]Conflict or Peace?In plain sight, the future of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has become the focus of attention. Will the conflict continue or move towards peace?This is a challenging and expectant question.
While we look forward to a peaceful solution to this conflict, we cannot ignore the difficulties and challenges involved. The international community is also looking forward to the development of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. The United Nations and other agencies have been calling on all parties to exercise restraint and seek a peaceful solution.
It is hoped that all parties concerned will reduce conflicts and engage in more dialogue, so as to bring real stability and peace to the region. The impact of the conflict on the local people has brought great suffering and losses to the people in the Palestinian-Israeli region. Ongoing wars are not only a threat to people's lives, but also to the future.
Therefore, a peaceful solution is imperative, which is the greatest responsibility to the local people. Hope for a Peaceful Settlement: Although the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is complex and difficult, there is still hope for a peaceful settlement. The international community should work together to find more possibilities for resolving the conflict and to bring about a better future for the people on the ground.
Conclusion] In the challenging and difficult Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we look forward to a future that will lead to peace and bring about real stability and development. Facing the future, let us work together for peace and for the resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. May the light of peace shine on this war-torn land.