In August 2021, he reported that the company violated laws and regulations, and was reported after receiving 1.1 million yuan in "grave relocation fees", and has now appealed.
In July 2021, Fu Lingzhi reported to the Hunan Provincial Public Security Department that Changjia Company had illegally mined, illegally occupied, forcibly occupied land, destroyed forest land, and destroyed private cemeteries
In August 2021, Fu Lingzhi hired someone to publish a real-name report letter titled "Changjia Mining, Return My Forest Land, Return My Farmland" on the local **.
Under the circumstance that Changjia Company did not continue to negotiate with Fu Lingzhi to move the grave, Fu Lingzhi put pressure on Changjia Company in order to achieve his compensation demand.
Under the mediation of the relevant persons in charge of the town ** and the village committee, the two sides made concessions and reached an agreement on compensation for the relocation of graves.
I have five questions about this:
1. Fu Lingzhi's million-dollar grave relocation fee was negotiated with Changjia Company, and was reached under the mediation of the town ** and the village committee, which is equivalent to getting the endorsement of the town ** and the village committee, why was he still sentenced to extortion?
2. Fu Lingzhi's million-dollar grave relocation fee was reported by someone else's real name, is this whistleblower related to Changjia Company?How did the whistleblower get the receipt of the million-dollar grave relocation fee?Is this a serial set given by Changjia Company?
3. This form of extortion is not uncommon, and you can't use the agreement you have reached as evidence to sue someone. If you don't recognize this agreement, why do you want to make this agreement just to be used as evidence?
Fourth, can you sacrifice the interests of others in order to achieve something and achieve your own interests?Can't others fight for their own interests?
You sacrifice the interests of others is not blackmail, others deduct some benefits from you is blackmail
5. Is there anyone obstructing judicial fairness?
I really don't understand, there are too many people who have been convicted of fraud because they asked for more demolition fees, why do you still give him demolition fees, you give him demolition fees, doesn't it mean that you approve it.
You backhand someone to sue someone for fraud, the key is that you can still win!