Originally, it was an instinct to help the elderly who fell on the side of the road, but since the Nanjing judge incident, everyone will become hesitant when they encounter the elderly who have fallen on the side of the road.
It's not that everyone has become indifferent, but they are afraid that they will accidentally bring trouble to themselves because of their kindness. After all, the lessons of the past are vivid.
But some people don't have a long memory, but because they are moved by compassion for a while, they don't want to end up bringing themselves trouble.
The incident happened in Hefei, Anhui Province, a black SUV was driving normally on the road, and when it reached the intersection of the right turn, it was found that an old man was riding an electric car in the wrong direction.
The black SUV slowed down quickly, and the old man riding an electric car was very fast, and when he saw the car coming, the old man should have panicked when he turned the corner, and as a result, he accidentally fell down with someone and the car.
The owner of the black SUV saw this scene, and out of kindness, he hurriedly stopped the car, and then got out of the car to help the old man.
The owner thought he had done a good deed, but he didn't want to get into trouble. The old man is old, and the speed of the car is very fast, so the fall is not light and requires surgery.
The family of the old man saw that the old man was seriously injured, so they asked the owner of the car to be responsible for the old man's fall and bear the corresponding responsibility.
In the eyes of the car owner, the old man's accident had nothing to do with him, he was doing a good deed, but he was asked to take responsibility, and he was naturally unwilling.
So he asked the local traffic police to uphold justice and determine whose responsibility was. I thought that the traffic police could stand on my side, but I didn't want to see the results of the traffic police, and the owner was stunned.
Although the black SUV has no contact with the old man riding an electric car, the fall of the old man has a lot to do with the owner, so the owner needs to bear secondary responsibility.
After the incident was on the Internet, it immediately aroused heated discussions among countless netizens, and many netizens said that they could not understand the judgment of the local traffic police.
Many netizens believe that this is not just a kind of living mud practice, it is the old man who went against the road first, so the traffic accident was caused, so the owner should not bear any responsibility.
However, what you say doesn't count, and what I say doesn't count. Whether to bear responsibility or not depends on the accident determination of the traffic police who handled the matter.
After the incident, ** interviewed the operator of the traffic police brigade in the jurisdiction, and the other party said that the traffic accident does not necessarily have to have physical physical contact to occur, and the cause of the accident is inconvenient to disclose.
On December 15, the owner's mother said that because they were too troublesome, they had recognized the secondary responsibility and asked the insurance company to handle the claim for the other party.
At the bottom of the related news, I saw many netizens criticizing the judgment of the traffic police, in fact, if strictly in the legal sense, even if the motor vehicle is not responsible, it will be required to bear a certain amount of responsibility, especially if someone is injured.
Therefore, from this point of view, there seems to be no problem with the judgment of the traffic police. And in my opinion, the real problem is the family of the old man who fell.
Logically speaking, it was the car owners who did good deeds and helped them, but instead of being grateful, they took a bite back.
Perhaps legally, they can hold the owner accountable, but morally and ethically, their behavior is despicable.
And the negative social effects caused by this incident are far greater than the incident itself. In the hearts of the public, it has been determined that the old man's family is a slanderous act, but the judgment of the traffic police has contributed to evil.
Therefore, on the one hand, the public will question the authority of the local traffic police, and on the other hand, when encountering similar things, the public will become timid, or even more indifferent.
Therefore, although the essence of the law is to help the weak, the relevant law enforcement personnel must take into account a certain degree of fairness when enforcing the law.
Otherwise, if you just act in accordance with the law and ignore the actual situation, you will only hurt the feelings of the public in the end, and what you will lose is the authority of the government.
So, do you think the owner should be responsible for the fall injury of the elderly?