The Russia-Ukraine conflict has lasted for more than 600 days, and the war has entered its third year, and the outside world is full of attention about who the ultimate winner will be. However, France has recently made a surprising **. Philippo, chairman of the French Patriot Party, said that France has changed its attitude towards reporting on the conflict in Ukraine. He believes that Western countries should stop aid to Ukraine and recognize Ukraine's defeat. Filippo's views have caused some controversy, but his words also reflect the uncertainty of European countries about the situation in Ukraine.
However, even as France expressed its disappointment with Ukraine in the **, the Ukrainian army remained stubborn in the conflict. Although the Ukrainian side faces a numerical disadvantage to the Russian army, they can still get some help from Western countries in terms of equipment and ammunition. In addition, Ukraine is also intensifying its efforts to modernize and reform its armed forces and is committed to improving its military strength. Therefore, regardless of France's **, Ukraine will continue to strive for strategic superiority.
At the same time, NATO has also smelled danger signals about the situation in Russia and Ukraine. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said that the front line in Ukraine has remained largely unchanged in the near future, raising concerns about the future development of the situation in Ukraine. Despite the relative calm of the war at the moment, Stoltenberg also warned that NATO must continue to support Ukraine in good times and bad. He stressed the phased nature of the conflict in Ukraine and said that NATO will take appropriate measures to deal with a possible aggravation of the situation.
However, despite NATO's strong willingness to support Ukraine, the problem of ammunition shortage in Ukraine remains unresolved. Not only the Ukrainian army, but even some NATO member states are facing the dilemma of insufficient ammunition **. Although some countries have made efforts to increase ammunition production capacity, Ukraine has always had the problem of insufficient ammunition. This issue has seriously weakened the confidence of NATO members in their support for Ukraine, and has also brought certain uncertainty to the development of the situation.
Recently, the British magazine "The Economist" pointed out that Putin seems to be winning the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The main reason for this is that Putin has long been prepared for the conflict and has purchased a large number of military supplies from abroad, including drones from Iran and artillery shells from North Korea. In contrast, the loss of Ukraine's own original equipment is extremely large, and the large-scale main force mainly relies on equipment from Western countries. However, Ukraine's large-scale** did not have the desired effect, which made Ukraine's situation in the conflict even worse.
Not only that, but Russia also has a clear advantage in the number of tanks, armored vehicles and artillery, and the population and number of active soldiers far exceed Ukraine. This makes it even more challenging for Ukraine to take a strong position on the battlefield in the conflict. Despite the fact that the Ukrainian army has improved in terms of tactics and tactics, there is still a certain gap compared to Russia.
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has been going on for more than 600 days, and it is still difficult to determine who the final winner will be. France's ** has sparked some controversy, but the Ukrainian army is still holding out its resistance, striving for a strategic advantage. NATO's sense of crisis about the situation in Ukraine is also rising, and they have emphasized their continued support for Ukraine. However, Ukraine still faces the problem of insufficient ammunition**, which seriously weakens the confidence of NATO member states in their support for Ukraine. On the other hand, Putin seems to be winning the conflict situation, and Russia clearly has the upper hand, from the ** of military supplies to the number of personnel and equipment. However, the ultimate winner of the conflict is still unknown, and Ukraine still has a chance to change the situation and strive for a better outcome.