Blinken on Sino-US Relations The United States should continue to rely on its strength to deal with China!
I just watched Blinken's year-end press conference, which really made me a little angry. This guy is still talking about it there, claiming that the United States will continue to deal with China based on the so-called "dominant position", which is simply infuriating!
I have to say, looking back on the past year of China-US relations, it has been really bumpy. The Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and the Korean Peninsula issue are all attracting the attention of the United States, as if China has been set aside. But don't forget, in the first half of the year, we were at a low point in the dialogue, which almost made people wonder if there was any hope for this dialogue.
However, the turning point came, and in the second half of the year, we saw that the Sino-US dialogue became more frequent, and last month we even met directly in San Francisco, and some consensus was reached. I think this is a good thing, at least it shows that the United States is beginning to realize that China is a big brother. However, just when I was expecting the US side to take more active action next year, Blinken made some chilling remarks at the year-end press conference.
He went so far as to say that he would deal with China "from a dominant position," and he also exaggerated the so-called "China threat" there, saying that in the face of the so-called "challenges" brought by China, the United States has "closer relations than before" with the G7, the European Union, and other allies. Isn't this a thing that you want to do against China?What kind of "advantageous position departure" is this?It's purely a game and confrontational thinking!
Netizens also commented, some said, "Why is the United States always so domineering, I'm really fed up!".Someone else sarcastically said, "Dominant position is to think that you are great, and you really think that the whole world has to listen to them?""I think netizens are right, this kind of domineering behavior makes people really uncomfortable to watch.
What's even more unpleasant is that Blinken doesn't seem to have listened to the Chinese side at all. As early as the 2021 China-US talks in Alaska, the Chinese side clearly told the US side that you are not qualified to talk to us from a so-called "advantageous position". But instead of reflecting, this guy continued to chatter at the year-end press conference, which is really ridiculous.
I think, did they Biden really wake up?It doesn't seem to be. This guy clearly knows that Sino-US relations have undergone a lot of changes, but he still wants to continue to play with the so-called "dominant position", isn't it boring for himself?
Looking at what the United States has done to China over the years, I feel that why do they not have a long memory?In 2018, when you began to contain China in an all-round way, did you feel that your comprehensive strength was significantly ahead of China?The result?In the past few years, it has not only encountered a lot of problems, but also completely revealed China's strong heritage.
At the beginning of this year, Biden also wanted to attack China in the field of semiconductor chips and prevent us from touching advanced chips in the United States. What are the results now?The U.S. Secretary of Commerce acknowledged that U.S. chip companies can cooperate with China, as long as they do not cooperate with us on advanced artificial intelligence chips. Does this mean admitting that it is difficult for China to gain an advantage in other areas?
You see, isn't it clear that the United States has nowhere to start?Their so-called "dominant position" is in **?When it comes to the game between China and the United States, this is one of the major events that has attracted the most attention from the international community in recent years. After all, China and the United States are the two largest economies in the world and have far-reaching implications for the global economy. The dispute between China and the United States is bound to have a certain impact on the global situation. This is what we have repeatedly reminded the US side that in the pursuit of hegemony, we should also take into account the feelings of the international community.
But why doesn't the United States give up?It's okay not to suppress China, but if you suppress it, you will expose the fact that your advantages are getting less and less. Now that the United States is in the field of great power games, what else can it have a clear advantage over China?Speaking of which, perhaps the most obvious is military allies.
Yes, the United States has an advantage in this regard. They have 31 countries in the NATO bloc, as well as a military alliance composed of the "Quadrilateral Security Dialogue" and Aukus. It seems to be powerful, but if you calculate carefully, some of them have repeated the calculation twice, and in fact there are only a limited number of real strategic threats. We in China, unlike them, do not like alliances, let alone establish military hegemony. So there really are no military allies, and this is also our independent choice.
Therefore, when Blinken says that he wants to engage with China on the basis of a "dominant position", he is actually shouting, that is, calling these allies. Of course, we are not afraid. No matter how many allies there are, in the end, it still depends on the showdown between the strength of the United States and our China. The vast majority of these allies are countries that are unlikely to pose a threat to China.
Therefore, we only need to follow our own path, accumulate steadily, and actively defend our sovereign integrity and the United StatesIn the end, I believe that in this Sino-US war, China will usher in the final victory!