The mobile phone brand vivo has always been in the spotlight, however, in my opinion, its only flaw is that the cooperation with screen manufacturers is not deep enough. At the same time, some competitors such as Xiaomi and Black Factory have established close cooperation with screen manufacturers such as TCL and BOE. In contrast, although vivo has made some cooperation, it has not chosen a specific screen vendor. This situation makes vivo's screen performance poor in this year's products, and it can even be said to be an all-round failure, which has brought inconvenience and dissatisfaction to consumers.
For example, some people have questioned why the vivo iQOO 12 Pro chose a curved screen instead of a straight screen design. There are also people who question the price increase of the E7 screen used by vivo iqoo 12 by 500 yuan, thinking that you can choose the standard Visionox screen, but vivo does not provide such a choice. This has caused dissatisfaction among some users, who expect vivo to establish a closer collaborative relationship with screen manufacturers in order to provide more choice and personalization in product design. For consumers, this is really dissatisfying. They hope that vivo can reach a better cooperation with manufacturers such as Visionox to provide more styles and specifications of screens to meet the needs of different users. This will give consumers more flexibility in choosing the right mobile phone for them.
However, as users, we should also understand the challenges and limitations that vivo may face when it comes to working with screen manufacturers. Chain cooperation is a complex process that requires multifaceted coordination and negotiation. vivo's inability to reach in-depth cooperation with specific screen manufacturers may involve a variety of reasons such as economic, technical or other partner factors. So, as consumers, we can make suggestions and expectations, but also understand the difficulties that brands face when it comes to working together. Through feedback and opinions, we can bring the brand's attention to the importance of users working together on the screen. This is expected to prompt brands to strengthen cooperation with screen manufacturers in future products and provide more high-quality screen options.
Overall, despite Vivo's problems with screen manufacturers, as a high-profile phone brand, we can expect them to step up their efforts in this area to provide consumers with more choice and satisfaction. At the same time, as users, we can also let brands understand our needs and expectations through feedback and suggestions, and jointly promote the progress and improvement of products. The flowers in the south of the city have bloomed - three acres of land.