Ukraine is in crisis, facing many difficulties with internal and external troubles. External aid has decreased, the offensive of the Russian army has become more and more fierce, and internal political contradictions have also shown a tendency to become open. The disagreement between Zelensky and the commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army, Zaluzh, has also become an important part of the Ukrainian crisis. In the midst of this infighting, Lukashenko had long foreseen the development of events. He noted that the differences between Ukraine ** and the military are the most acute. This disagreement is rooted in the fact that Zaluzhny is more familiar with Soviet tactics, while Zelensky believes that NATO is omnipotent. But NATO's tactics have proven to be unworkable on the battlefield in Ukraine. The dilemma facing Ukraine needs to be resolved with a more pragmatic attitude and solutions.
The fighting of the Ukrainian army has been going on in the eastern region for seven years. And in the course of this war, the differences between Ukraine** and the army have never stopped. In the most recent one, the Ukrainian army suffered another defeat, and at the same time, the divisions between the officers were once again exposed. Ukrainian ** Zelensky stressed that he wanted to "divide the troops into two ways", but his idea was opposed by Zaluzhny. Zaluzhny is more inclined to the idea of NATO, wanting to concentrate forces on advancing in the south. Such disagreements caused a lot of discontent within the army and also affected the fighting of the Ukrainian army. Zaluzhny's idea has received more support, as his choice as commander-in-chief has consistently proven to be more favorable to the Ukrainian army.
And Zelensky's political considerations have limited the movement of the Ukrainian army. In this case, the Ukrainian people's trust in Zaluzhny is also much higher than in Zelensky. Now some voices are calling for Zaluzhny to take Zelensky's place. But Zelensky stressed that the person who commanded the battle should not be in politics, suggesting that Zaluzhny's position should remain the same. However, the problem is that the impact of political intervention on the Ukrainian army cannot be ignored. If politicians constantly interfere in the actions of the army, then it will be difficult for the Ukrainian army to emerge victorious in battle. In fact, what Ukraine's army needs is a leader who can think and make decisions independently, not someone who is controlled by politicians.
Only then will it be possible for Ukraine to emerge victorious in the next battles.