According to Russia Today, the riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, has raised concerns, and the Pentagon's internal anti-riot operation is at least partly a response to the former. In that incident, the ** broke into the Capitol and tried to undermine the congressional certification of Biden's victory, causing mass riots, and 21 of the first batch of 150 people were active military personnel or veterans. This incident shocked the Pentagon very much and also sounded the alarm bell for Austin.
According to the annual report released by the U.S. Department of Defense, between 2022 and 2023, 78 active-duty U.S. troops were charged with allegedly participating in or supporting a plot to overthrow the United States**. These servicemen come from various branches of the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, and some of them serve as senior officers. They are accused of collusion with external forces to overthrow the United States through various means, including online communications, social interactions**, and secret meetings.
In response to this situation, the US Department of Defense has begun to take a series of measures, such as introducing new rules and regulations, strengthening the review process, and conducting in-depth investigations, to eliminate potential extremist influences within the military. At the same time, the United States** is also considering further strengthening its control over military policies and daily affairs to prevent the re-emergence and spread of extremist forces.
First, let's look at the background of this event. According to reports, in the past few years, there have been a number of cases within the US team that are suspected of supporting the overthrow. These cases involve active-duty military personnel expressing support for the overthrow through social media channels and other channels, and some military personnel are even involved in actual planning activities. These cases have raised questions about the internal management of the US ** team, and also raised doubts about whether the Pentagon has taken sufficient measures to prevent similar incidents from happening.
So, is the active U.S. military really suspected of supporting the overthrow of **? We need to understand what "support for overthrow" means, according to the legal definition, support for overthrow refers to encourage, assist, or promote illegal acts of regime change through words, actions, etc. In this case, a number of active-duty military personnel were accused of supporting the overthrow by making statements and participating in planned activities. Whether these acts constitute support for overturn** needs to be judged in the light of relevant laws and evidence.
However, we cannot ignore the fact that in this case, some of the allegations may be somewhat controversial. For example, some military personnel may make statements that express their views on political issues rather than genuinely support overthrowing**. In addition, some military personnel may be involved in planning activities motivated by personal interest or curiosity rather than genuine support for overthrow**. Therefore, we need to conduct a case-by-case analysis to determine whether there is genuine support for overturning.
Next, let's take a look at whether the Pentagon has an "internal ghost". According to reports, the Pentagon has taken a number of measures to prevent similar incidents from happening. For example, the management and supervision within the armed forces have been strengthened, and the education and training of servicemen on active duty have been strengthened. These measures show that the Pentagon is already working to prevent similar incidents from happening.
However, we cannot rule out that there may be some "ghosts" in the Pentagon. These may be high-level **, military advisers, or other key figures who may be pushing to support a plan to overthrow ** by hiding their true intentions or deliberately misleading their superiors. If this is the case, then the Pentagon needs to take more stringent measures to detect and eliminate these "ghosts".
In short, is the active US military really suspected of supporting the overthrow of **? Is there an "inner ghost" in the Pentagon? These issues need to be judged on the basis of specific facts and evidence. However, we cannot rule out that management and supervision within the armed forces still need to be strengthened and improved. At the same time, we also need to remain vigilant to prevent similar incidents from happening and ensure the security and stability of the country. U.S. military
One last question.
If there is a rebellion in the United States.
Who supports it?