Is it reasonable for retirees to get paid well?This topic is a bit of a "provocative" one. How high is high?Retirees have worked hard for decades, and some people have become jealous of the pension they receive. According to this logic, is it better for retirees to cancel their pensions?
Think about it calmly, who do they rely on to support the future life of the elderly who do not have a pension?
Pensions are not unique to socialist countries, but to capitalist countries, and they are also high and low.
Don't shy away from questions. Before discussing this topic, we can also think about such a question in reverse, in the face of the millions of annual salary positions openly recruited by the society, do you want to compete?Well, that begs the question – how many people are capable of this high-paying position?
It is not a public position in a hurry, although the salary is attractive, but the reality is that 90 percent, or even higher than this proportion of people, will be discouraged, because only very professional, and with a very high professional quality, it is possible to be shortlisted, whether to win or not to fight for strength depends on luck.
For example, the secretary of the board of directors of Vanke during the Wang Shi period, and the secretary of the board of directors of Vanke during that period, the annual salary of this position was much larger than the magnitude of "million annual salary". Another example is Huawei, everyone knows that Huawei has a high salary and recruits all year round, but how many people can pass five levels and six will enter this company?
Again, non-public jobs, including high-paying positions that are openly recruited by Huawei, Goose Factory, etc., need to meet the hard standard of "very professional and highly professional", which keeps thousands of job seekers out.
Do you think it's unreasonable?There is no way, if an enterprise wants to make achievements in an industry, it must "choose the best of the best".
Having the will doesn't necessarily mean that you can afford a high position and a high salary. Extrapolatingly, it is a truth that if you want to get a high pension and whether you have the ability to get a high pension, there is also a large proportion of people who are "rejected" from the red line of survival of the fittest. After washing all the lead and seeing the true face, everyone has been repeatedly washed in the "big waves and sand", which is not easy to come by.
Back to the topic of "is it reasonable for retirees to get paid highs?" As we all know, the level of pension is closely related to four factors, namely, "personal working years, social security payment stalls when employed, job titles and social roles".
Four factors" are crucial.
Suddenly a phenomenon comes to mind, herbivores, such as rabbits and sheep, can they be jealous of donkeys, cows, horses, and giraffes that eat more than them?In "Animal World", it seems that we have never seen the phenomenon of donkeys, horses, and cows driving out rabbits or sheep by virtue of their large size, each eating their own food, and they are safe with each other. However, carnivores are not accustomed to each other, and in order to compete for limited resources, they do not hesitate to kill each other, and it is not uncommon.
Isn't that what people look like?
People who do not understand or are not convinced that some retirees receive high pensions will certainly not be convinced by those who have higher salaries than him, but what can be done?You are not a rule-maker, nor are you a "king", and you cannot influence the distribution of social wealth to the people who serve the society, so you must force yourself to accept the social admonition that "no comparison does no harm".
There is no free meal in the world, and of course there is no "profit" for not working, especially do not compare retirees who have left the social stage with fledgling people, the time difference between the two, the spirit and spirit, annual rings, including income, are all confused, young people and retirees compare strength?Going back a few decades, you don't have to be one.
than contribution?It seems that retirees have "nothing to do", and there are a lot of pensions in their accounts every month, but if you substitute the factor of "time difference" into it, you will look at itThey have already suffered "a thousand kinds of suffering" decades ago, and the hardships they have experienced are all unimaginable hardships for modern people.
Have you ever seen food stamps, cloth stamps, meat stamps, egg stamps, and sugar stamps?You are amazed at the taste of wild vegetables mixed with multigrains;You ride your bike for fitness**. What you don't know is that without food stamps, or when the ration runs out, their generation will have to rely on wild vegetables that are hard to swallow;Bicycles were the luxury "big" of those days, and that generation didn't ride them to show off their wealth, but to save two cents on a bus ticket to get to work.
Compared with these, people who have this question are still entangled in whether it is reasonable for some retirees to take high pensions?
No one's treatment is blown by the wind. A on-the-job, engaged in general staff work, no title and no position, daily working hours 8 hours +, salary 3500 yuan per month;B engaged in clean energy scientific research for 40 years, has made achievements and has a senior title, after retirement, the pension is 12,000 yuan. Don't raise the bar, in good conscience, should B enjoy this high pension treatment?
Should A be jealous of B's high pension?