Xiong Da claimed that the netizen Xiamen veteran registered an account of "Song Sanyi Runs Through the Ancient and Modern" on Baijia, and posted an insult and slander against him. I haven't seen these **, but I saw a statement made by a Xiamen veteran on the Internet that he had never registered any account on Baijia, and the "Song Sanyi Ancient and Modern" account had nothing to do with him.
This is strange, since the Xiamen veteran doesn't admit it, what evidence does Xiong Da have to prove that the account is related to the Xiamen veteran?How to prove that the ** released by that account was done by a veteran in Xiamen?Without the proof of the Baijiahao platform, and the conclusion of the investigation by the judicial organs, why did Xiong Da insist that it was the responsibility of the Xiamen veterans?
Civil litigation emphasizes that "whoever asserts the claim shall bear the burden of proof", while criminal litigation emphasizes that "a person cannot incriminate himself". Since Xiong Da filed a criminal private prosecution with the court, demanding that the Xiamen veteran be held criminally responsible for insulting and **, then he should bear the burden of proof, and should not let the Xiamen veteran prove his innocence. But Xiong Da's evidence is in **?The evidence he accused the Xiamen veterans was simply chasing after the wind and shadows and guessing nonsense. His practice of indiscriminately buttoning his hat is a pure fabrication of facts and constitutes defamation in law. Now it seems that it was not the Xiamen veteran who slandered Xiong Da, but it is likely that Xiong Da slandered the Xiamen veteran, and it seems that Xiong Da should be standing in the defendant's dock!
Xiong Da and the Baolao faction have always called for Lao Rongzhi's case to be handled as an ironclad case, without the slightest flaw or doubt, otherwise it will not conform to the spirit of the rule of law. But does the evidence he used against Xiamen veterans meet this standard? With such evidence, he also wants to frame people for crimes, does he think that the court was opened by his family?Xiong Da claims to be a famous lawyer, so he should show some convincing professional level, but he openly engages in double standards in the rules for determining evidence. If you want to convict Lao Rongzhi, you must have ironclad evidence, and if you want to convict the Xiamen veteran, you can just rely on what he says. Such an obvious double standard, is there a problem with Xiong Da's own level, or does he despise the IQ of the majority of netizens from the bottom of his heart?
The court was not opened by Xiong Da, and the law was not explained by Xiong Da as he wanted. Xiong Da engages in double standards, except for exposing his incompetence, ignorance, and shamelessness, which makes people laugh and be generous, he can't get anything else.
Creative Inspiration Center