Japan has recently been collectively condemned by many "celebrities" in the international community, triggering an intriguing incident. Let's start by thinking about the question: Is it reasonable for the United States to station troops in Japan?The latest news shows that Japan's Kishida** is trying to promote the relocation plan of the Futenma base of the US military in Japan through the method of "acting on behalf of the executive". In short, Japan wanted the US military to leave, but it was not easy to achieve. It should be noted that the presence of US troops has a double meaning to a certain extent, on the one hand, to "guard" Japan, and on the other hand, to carry out a global military deployment plan.
According to a report by Japan's Kyodo News Agency, on January 6, more than 400 world celebrities jointly condemned Japan's promotion of the relocation of US military bases, pointing out that this exposes the urgency of Japan's right-wing forces to seek to get rid of the shackles of the post-war system and become a "capable country". In recent years, Japan has been carrying out "self-deregulation", and the United States is also assisting in it, such as exporting F-35 fighters to Japan and supporting Japan's transformation of aircraft carriers. I believe that Japan may want to truly achieve "freedom", but while building up its military power, it must get rid of the "supervision" of the United States. It can be compared to a criminal who wants to "break out of prison", first to obtain **, and then to get rid of the "guarding" police. Japan has been very restless in recent years and is constantly trying to get out of post-war restrictions.
It strengthened the construction of the "Self-Defense Forces", increased the "cooperation" of offensive ** equipment, and reached an agreement with Britain and Italy on the joint development of next-generation fighters. Japan's "assistance" to countries at war is best evidenced by its assistance to Ukraine. In addition, Japan is also exporting some ** equipment. These actions show that Japan is gradually emerging from post-war punishment and is eager for "military and political normalization." In my opinion, there is no reason for the international community to forgive Japan until Japan admits its crimes, let alone abandon its supervision. One might think that the expulsion of U.S. troops from the Asia-Pacific region would also be a good thing. First of all, this time it involves "relocation", that is, the US military does not intend to leave.
Japan wants to get rid of regulation, but it does not dare to ask the United States to leave, so it can only push for "relocation". The presence of U.S. troops around the globe is considered to have a "double significance." Although the current global deployment of the United States poses a threat to peace and stability in various regions, I believe that it is more beneficial to the peace and stability of the world and the region by insisting on high-intensity supervision of Japan than to "liberate" Japan, which is exactly what Fumio Kishida emphasized. This issue is more "complicated" as it relates to the Okinawa region. Okinawa is currently a "territory" of Japan, and although there are some historical controversies, this will not have an impact on the current division of the country. Therefore, it can be said that Japan has "interfered" in the relocation of US troops in the Okinawa area, and the outside world cannot prevent this act.
Second, it is an indisputable fact that Japan is constantly loosening itself, and it is necessary to curb it for whatever reason. In short, both U.S. bases abroad and Japan's unbundling of Japan are undermining regional peace, but Japan's influence is more far-reaching and may lead to greater "harm." (Wen Xiaotie).