Those with deep eyes and three-dimensional noses are often easily perceived as mixed-race rather than pure-blooded Han Chinese.
It's just that the little toe has two fingernails, which has become a standard for judging bloodline, which is unexpected. So what is the origin of a person with such characteristics? Is it true that as some netizens said, they belong to pure-blooded Han Chinese?
What is a pure-blooded Han people, which means that before the great integration of the Chinese nation, the Han people who lived in the Central Plains region.
Although no one knows why the two-petaled nail on the little toe became the way purebred Han Chinese are determined, one thing that modern science can be sure of is that this is pure nonsense.
First of all, judge this matter from the perspective of dialectics. If having two nails on the little toe is a sign of a purebred Han Chinese, then there should be no two-petal nails on the little toe in other races.
However, scientists have found that it is not only people in Korea, Japan, and Mongolia who are close to us who have two-petal nails, but also white Europeans.
When the special in the original cognition is universal, the so-called proof is just a joke.
What's more, in the course of China's 5,000-year historical development, the Han people in the Central Plains have accepted and assimilated countless foreign nationalities, and how should future generations prove that the little toe has two nails, not these foreign peoples?
So, why do some people's little toe nails split into two petals? There are three main ways to say this, which are:The regional theory, the knife slash theory, and the behavioral impact theory
First of all, justGeography saysIn terms of an experimental survey that was done by Fudan University.
After research, the researchers found that in Shanxi, the proportion of people with two nails on the little toe far exceeds that of other provinces. Because of this, experts and scholars speculate that Shanxi may be the birthplace of the characteristics of the two-petal nail.
In the process of historical development, a part of the Shanxi people migrated outward and brought this characteristic to other places. This argument is supported by the argument that the farther away from Shanxi province, the fewer people have two fingernails on their little toes.
Secondly,Knife chopping saidCompared with the regional theory, the knife slashing theory is biased towards folklore and does not have much credibility.
According to legend, in the late Yuan Dynasty and early Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang crusaded against the Yuan Dynasty and launched a full-scale attack on the north, and the population of many provinces was seriously reduced due to the war.
Faced with such a situation, Zhu Yuanzhang had no choice but to order the aborigines of Shanxi to move outward to ensure the balanced development of the surrounding provinces. However, in ancient times, the transportation was inconvenient, and the homeland was difficult to move, and the residents of Shanxi were really reluctant to leave their hometown.
To this end, all Shanxi residents who were forced to relocate to other provinces gathered under the big locust tree in Hongdong County, Shanxi, and all cut their little toe nails in half.
The main reason why this statement is not credible is that although there have been incidents in history when Shanxi residents gathered under the big locust tree and migrated outward, there was no case of cutting the little toenails at all.
Through their own conjectures, later generations summed up this possibility and justified the pure-blooded Han people, whose starting point is understandable, but the way is not worthy of recognition.
The last argument is relatively plain. If we want to understand this cognitive viewpoint, we have to start with the ancient Chinese agricultural civilization.
Unlike the maritime civilization on which the West depended, the ancient Chinese agricultural civilization required the land as the foundation of survival, and the family could pass it on from generation to generation by guarding a piece of land.
However, when working in the field, the fragile little toes are prone to inversion. Over time, what was originally a whole little toe nail is also likely to become two petals.
Generations of native pure-bred native Han people, after multiplication, this characteristic gradually formed a specific physiological form, so there is a "pure-blooded Han" logo cognition.
The first statement states:phenomenon, the second statement is that of the common peopleImagineAs for the third statement, although it seems to be very scientific and reasonable, it also does not explain the impact of the great integration of ethnic groups in the process of ancient historical development.
Therefore, the characteristics of the so-called pure-blooded Han people are just a kind of wishful thinking of later generations. Just as the white Europeans relied on the maritime civilization to live, and spent much less time working in the fields than the Han Chinese, but the same traits appeared, how can this be explained?
Rather than focusing on proving the pure-blooded Han Chinese, it is better to spend time thinking about what is unique to the Chinese nation.
What is it unusual to have two nails on the little toe? In the course of human historical development, only the Chinese nation can tolerate and assimilate all foreign nations, and this is truly something worthy of recognition and pride of future generations.