When Huawei's 5G construction began, China set a vision to make 5G accessible to the world.
But as soon as the US sanctions arrived, China's beautiful blueprint shattered with a snap.
As the world's number one scientific and technological hegemon, the United States does not believe that China's science and technology are intended to benefit all mankindIn their eyes, China is a "cake" that wants to get involved in scientific and technological products, so in the name of security, they have played all kinds of tricks.
The Biden team's governance philosophy against Huawei is basically a realistic version of the Weibo judge's sentence to death for prisoners. Anyway, people are the root of all problems, and if you mess people up, the problem will definitely not exist.
As a result, a large number of products that have little to do with Huawei have to be dismantled, countries that use Huawei products have been criticized, and Huawei's top executives have also been imprisoned overseas.
But after destroying Huawei's things, what should be done with Western communications construction?
At this time, U.S. operators launched a new set of communication solutions, saying goodbye to Huawei completely.
In order to replace Huawei, the American giant launched a new solution.
In order to better replace Huawei, Western giants have pushed products and solutions called Open RAN.
Different from traditional communication equipment, the Open RAN model is to break the tradition, open all interfaces, and provide components from different vendors, as long as they meet the same protocol, they can be assembled and operated.
Recently, Ericsson and Nokia have participated in the plan to convert 70% of mobile network traffic into the plan.
Once successful, Ericsson will replace Huawei and become the world's number one 5G provider with the support of all parties.
It sounds like a watertight plan, but the implementation is like a flood discharge from the Three Gorges.
The new plan of the US side?It's all!
No matter how perfect this plan is, the quality of the network after rejecting Huawei technology is quite a huge challenge.
Secondly, the new plan of the US side has directly reversed history, greatly raising 5G**, and ordinary foreign users have to spend tens of thousands of yuan a year.
In the end, the essence of Open RAN is that everyone can't compare to Huawei in terms of technology alone, so they form a group to fight together to suppress Chinese companies.
It sounds awesome, but you have to take a break as soon as you put it into reality.
For example, one day, if there is a problem in a country with open ran, call ** to call the companies participating in the program to investigate.
Nokia came over to check it and found that it was not his own problem, so Shi Shiran left;
Ericsson also came to check, and it was not his problem, so he drifted away;
at&t came over to check ......Well, I found out that it might be my own problem, but it's just a possibility, in order not to take the blame and insist that it's not my own problem;
As soon as Vodafone came, he also found that it might be a problem with his own equipment, but this failure seemed to be caused by the device next door, NokiaSo the last bite was not his own problem, and he casually accused a wave of Nokia.
Do you see?As soon as this set of solutions is put into reality, it is destined to be only nonsense, and it is all users who suffer - who cares if 5G is successful or not?Everyone only cares about how to suppress Huawei!
Something. The United States has been exerting pressure on Chinese telecommunications companies operating in the United States in the name of "**". It has tried to convince other countries to avoid using Huawei's equipment when building 5G networks.
What's more, the U.S. side also framed Huawei for having close ties with China, claiming that it was conducting espionage activities in the United States. This tactic of "catching a thief shouting at a thief" seems to have become a consistent practice in the United States.
However, the gap in hard power is difficult to erase, and it is still too early to say goodbye to Huawei. I'm a tech creator