At the end of December 2023, after Cao Yunjin donated 200,000 yuan to the ** disaster areas in Gansu and Qinghai, some people on the Internet launched large-scale rumors and slanders against him.
Even after the China Charity Federation has released a report thanking Cao Yunjin for donating 200,000 yuan, there are still some netizens who have carried out cyberbullying and rumors against Cao Yunjin with just a screenshot of "Cao Yunjin donates 1 yuan", and "Cao Yunjin's fraudulent donation" once rushed to the hot search.
Forced to be helpless, Cao Yunjin chose to call the police and issued a solemn statement, and the major ** also spoke out for him, and people who did not let positive energy donate money and were scolded.
For many netizens, this incident encountered by Cao Yunjin is not unfamiliar, because similar things happened as early as 2021, but the protagonist of that time was Hou Yaohua, and Jiang Kun was piggybacked.
1. Review "Hou Yaohua donated 30".
On July 28, 2021, Hou Yaohua issued a solemn statement, accusing the "Hou Yaohua Donation 30" that is being hyped on the Internet, and issued a serious warning to those who spread rumors.
The reason why this matter is fermenting on the Internet is rooted in a picture, someone shared a screenshot of a donation of 30 yuan to the Zhengzhou Red Cross Society on the Internet, and the donor column shows "Hou Yaohua".
As a result, some self-** and netizens ridiculed and abused Hou Yaohua, in this atmosphere, Hou Yaohua personally reported some rumors on the one hand, and on the other hand, he issued a statement to warn some self-** and netizens.
At the same time as "Hou Yaohua donated 30" was fermenting, another screenshot of "Jiang Kun donated 10 yuan" also appeared on the Internet.
The author questioned this matter at the time, thinking that "Hou Yaohua donated 30" and "Jiang Kun donated 10 yuan" were quite strange and belonged to "fake" things.
In order to investigate the truth, the author also donated money to it through the official *** of the Zhengzhou Red Cross Society, and found that the name of the donor can be written casually in the column of the donor.
The author donated 025 yuan, and sure enough, he got the electronic donation certificate issued by the Zhengzhou Red Cross, which shows that any person who donates can make a screenshot effect of "Trump donates two cents and five cents".
In this way, the rumors of "Hou Yaohua donating 30" and "Jiang Kun donating 10 yuan" are self-defeating.
Second, let's look at "Cao Yunjin's fraudulent donation".
On December 21, a screenshot of "Cao Yunjin donated 1 yuan" appeared on the Internet, and the author thought of the "Hou Yaohua donated 30" incident that happened in 2021, thinking that this was just another "fake" thing, and no one believed it.
Maybe the first netizens who made "Cao Yunjin donated 1 yuan" were out of a prank mentality, but what people didn't expect was that at 21:56 on December 21, a well-known self-** "Huaxia Beep" took this fake screenshot and issued the article "Cao Yunjin donated 200,000?".was exposed by netizens to donate only 1 yuan, and the P picture fraud storm intensified
Due to the huge number of readings of the article, it triggered other self-leading followers, so "Cao Yunjin was questioned about fraudulent donations" rushed to the hot search.
There are two strange things about this incident, one is that the China Charity Federation published an article praising Cao Yunjin's donation on the homepage of the official website as early as 16:40 pm on December 21, "It was donated by the Gold Federation - the famous cross talk actor Cao Yunjin donated 200,000 yuan through the China Charity Federation to help the ** disaster area in Qinghai, Gansu".
In other words, the blogger "Huaxia Beep" did not go to the official website of the China Charity Federation to verify when he posted the article, and would rather believe an inexplicable screenshot of a netizen than the official website.
The other is that the screenshot of "Cao Yunjin donated 1 yuan" is also unreliable, the author made a donation through the China Charity Federation, and found that the whole process is no different from the 2021 Zhengzhou Red Cross, and the name of the donor can be filled in at will.
So, the author did a number of tests and directly restored the entire production process of the screenshot of "Cao Yunjin donated 1 yuan", which took no more than one minute.
In the face of the screenshot of "fake at a glance", as a well-known self-a**, he not only gave up going to the official website for verification but was also unwilling to spend a minute verifying, and directly posted an article with rhythm, so that Cao Yunjin, who donated 200,000 yuan, was wronged, which was indeed too much.
Fortunately, after Cao Yunjin himself called the police and dealt with it, and there were some righteous self-refuting rumors, on the afternoon of December 22, the hot search of "Cao Yunjin fraudulent donation" finally disappeared, and many netizens demanded that the rumor-mongers be punished, and people with positive energy could not be wronged in vain.
That night, Cao Yunjin's lawyer also sent a lawyer's letter to the article platform and Zi** "Huaxia Beep", requesting that Zi** delete the article and make a written formal apology.
3. Who is behind the scenes?
Cao Yunjin mentioned a sentence in his statement, "I hope to find out what is behind the scenes", So, who is behind this incident?
Let's look at the hype of "Hou Yaohua donated 30" and "Jiang Kun donated 10 yuan" in 2021, and then look at the hype of "Cao Yunjin fraudulent donation" in 2023, you will find that there are several bloggers who have a clear position.
Just after the rumors of "Cao Yunjin's fraudulent donation" were refuted, some Gangsi Zi** still exaggerated the new rumor "Cao Yunjin self-directed and self-acted" through articles and group chats, deliberately luring Gangsi to hype up "Cao Yunjin's fraudulent donation".
According to the logic of these guidelines, Cao Yunjin deliberately donated 200,000 yuan, and then deliberately issued a donation certificate, and then found someone to deliberately make a screenshot of "Cao Yunjin donated 1 yuan", and continued to deliberately find a well-known self-** such as "Huaxia Beep Machine" to hype up "Cao Yunjin's fraudulent donation", and also deliberately created traffic by refuting rumors and fraudulent donations, and finally deliberately sent a lawyer's letter to the well-known self-** asking the other party to delete the text and apologize.
I have to say that the brain circuits of these gangsi are not only large enough but also clear enough, which is a typical use of one rumor to cover up another rumor, and its purpose is naturally self-evident.
It's a pity that such an inferior and unreasonable rumor can't make the majority of netizens believe it at all, and in the end it will only shoot itself in the foot.
However, then again, just because there is a compliment in the hype of "Hou Yaohua's donation of 30" and "Cao Yunjin's fraudulent donation", can it be determined that the behind-the-scenes of these two things is Deyun Club?
The author believes that if you have to draw an equal sign between Gangsi Zi** and Deyun Club, it is a bit far-fetched, after all, the level of these rumors is inferior and the logic is ridiculous, just like Cao Yunjin cannot cheat donations, Deyun Club will not support this low-level self-** blogger.
The biggest possibility is that these Gangsi self-** just want to get traffic from Gangsi and the attention of Deyun Club by discrediting Cao Yunjin, but it's a pity that being smart was mistaken by being smart, not only could not succeed, but also let Deyun Club eat melons.
The author believes that when Cao Yunjin has begun to defend his rights, Deyun Club should also defend its rights, warning those bloggers who are under the banner of Gangsi Zi ** not to use the reputation of Deyun Club to hype traffic, let alone spread rumors to slander Deyun Club's peers.
Finally, quoting a netizen's message, donating money to the disaster area to tide over the difficulties together is a serious matter, and we can't let some people with bad intentions destroy our good network environment.
As Cao Yunjin said in his statement, the online world is also a pure land.