Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click "Follow", so that you can access a series of high-quality articles at any time, and at the same time facilitate discussion and sharing, thank you for your support
On June 12, 2023, Japan's Tokyo Electric Power Company announced that it will conduct a trial operation of nuclear wastewater discharge in Fukushima, and plans to officially discharge nuclear wastewater into the sea in the summer. The news shocked the world and triggered a strong reaction from neighboring countries. There are even rumors of a "salt shortage" in South Korea, with China naming four provinces, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Anhui and Fujian, to be prepared for protection. The controversy over nuclear wastewater, which stemmed from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, had a profound impact on Japan and its neighbors.
On March 11, 2011, a Class 9** nuclear power plant occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, resulting in the large fuel plant of Unit 1** and the leakage of radioactive materials in the nuclear power plant. The Chernobyl-related nuclear accident left the fields of Fukushima and the surrounding areas deserted for a year, and radioactive contamination became a serious problem. Although tests a year later showed a decline in radioactive contamination in nearby fields, doubts remain about products from Fukushima's origin.
TEPCO found two loose containers in the area where the waste was stored near the nuclear power plant, resulting in a third leak. In order to solve a nuclear leak similar to Chernobyl, the Japanese authorities decided to use fresh and seawater to cool the nuclear reactor of **. During the cooling process, a large amount of fresh water and seawater becomes nuclear-contaminated wastewater, which infiltrates into the land and groundwater, forming the nuclear-contaminated wastewater from the Fukushima nuclear power plant incident.
After the cooling was completed, TEPCO began discharging nuclear wastewater into the Pacific Ocean. Despite the purification, the discharge of nuclear wastewater exceeded the minimum allowance by more than 300 times. In order to solve the problem of nuclear wastewater treatment, Japan has carried out the construction of wastewater storage tanks, which store more than 1.3 million tons of nuclear wastewater.
However, due to the small size of the country, Japan is reluctant to expand storage sites. Faced with the situation, Japan's decision to discharge nuclear wastewater into the sea has aroused strong opposition from countries around the world. China named four provinces, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Anhui and Fujian, and asked them to prepare for protection. Japan** has assured countries that the discharge of filtered nuclear wastewater will not harm the environment, but it has been questioned by countries around the world.
In the face of Japan's insistence, China named four provinces to demand that protective measures be strengthened for the public and import controls on Japanese products. South Korea has imposed a ban on the import of seafood from the Fukushima region due to a salt shortage due to the approaching release of Fukushima nuclear wastewater. Dissatisfied with the inaction of **, South Korea filed a lawsuit against Japan** at the International Tribunal for the Sea.
The United States and some regions have expressed support for Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge, arguing that it meets globally recognized nuclear safety standards. Taiwan Province** also expressed support for Japan's actions, however, the Taiwanese people expressed strong dissatisfaction with this. Focusing on the remarks that "nuclear wastewater is harmless", the Taiwanese people collectively ** in front of the Taiwan Exchange Association in Japan.
Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge is a short-sighted act that focuses only on short-term benefits and ignores long-term harm. Although the discharge of nuclear wastewater can save money on clean-up, the environmental pollution caused by the ocean will be a huge hidden danger that will be difficult to solve in the future. In the face of global opposition, Japan's ignorance may lead to a crisis of public confidence in the world, and even cause internal and external troubles.
Japan should have a clear understanding of the pros and cons of nuclear wastewater discharge, accept the urging of other countries, and turn to the world for help. Insisting on going its own way may eventually make Japan a public enemy of the world, and the gains outweigh the losses.
At present, Japan's decision to discharge nuclear wastewater into the sea has aroused great concern and strong repercussions around the world. Behind this move is environmental, economic, political and other fields, causing dissatisfaction and concern among people in various countries and at home.
First of all, from an environmental point of view, the discharge of nuclear wastewater will have a long-term and serious impact on the marine ecosystem. Even though Japan claims to have filtered, emissions that exceed the minimum standard by more than 300 times still raise questions from countries around the world. The ocean is a key component of the Earth's ecosystem, and the discharge of nuclear wastewater is bound to trigger a chain reaction, damage the ecological balance of the ocean, and pose a potential threat to marine life and human health.
Secondly, from an economic point of view, this decision has also affected the stability of the international and regional economies to a certain extent. The reaction of neighboring countries such as China to Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge has been manifested in bans and strict inspections, which have directly affected the ** between the two countries. At the same time, the "salt shortage" in South Korea due to imminent emissions has highlighted people's concerns about food safety, which has caused a certain impact on related industries.
In addition, at the political level, Japan's unilateral decision has caused dissatisfaction among neighboring countries and the international community. China has named four provinces and demanded stronger protection measures for their populations, while South Korea has prosecuted through the International Tribunal for the Sea, demonstrating concern for international law and the safety of the population. However, the support of the United States and other countries has emboldened Japan, which also reflects the complex relationships in the international political system.
At the domestic level, Japan** is not transparent enough to communicate with its people, and it has failed to obtain a broad social consensus. Many environmental groups and fishermen have expressed strong dissatisfaction with the decision, fearing that the decision will be devastating to the local seafood industry. And the distrust and actions of the people can lead to social unrest, internal and external troubles.
Overall, Japan's move to discharge nuclear wastewater into the sea has aroused widespread global concern and opposition. This is not only an environmental storm, but also a complex issue involving economic, political and social stability. The international community needs to work together to induce Japan** to reconsider this decision and adopt a more responsible attitude in order to safeguard the global environment and the common interests of humanity.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!