I never imagined that Britain would actually take action against China, and what actions should China take to counter it?
We should be determined to be determined and trained:
To bring down Britain is to defeat America's hardcore and most powerful thugs. We don't have to take action against the United States, we get rid of the right arm of the United States. Moreover, as the betrayer of the EU, most EU countries at least welcome China's attack on the UK. Defeating Britain is not a matter of killing chickens and making an example of monkeys, but of a major action to "kill monkeys and make an example of monkeys." The biggest benefit of defeating Britain is that in the future, few countries will follow the United States to provoke China.
The UK announced on December 6 that it would introduce 46 new measures against individuals and entities in the Russian military chain, with the latest sanctions on companies in China, Turkey, Serbia, the United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan. Among them are 3 Chinese companies.
Sanctioning enterprises and individuals in 5 countries at a time, the UK ** This is really the feeling of eating the gall of a leopard, and it is completely unafraid that the joint countermeasures of these countries will bring more serious consequences to the UK.
Originally, sanctioning enterprises in other countries is actually a self-cutting action, because the interests of domestic companies are also damaged because of the loss of the first amount.
What is the rationale for the UK's sanctions?On the grounds of "support for the Russian war machine".
It seems that Sunak has learned from the hegemony and bullying of the United States, and in order to make other countries obey his will, he does not allow freedom between other countries.
The problem is that Britain, which has long since declined from the "empire on which the sun never sets" to the "country of the west mountains at sunset", has the courage to be enemies of China and other countries in such a dilemma.
Ten of the first, as the number one thug of the United States, the United Kingdom, this is a move to stand on the front line of anti-China instead of the United States.
Because in order to stabilize China and fool China into increasing its holdings of U.S. bonds, Biden personally reiterated the "four noes and one no" commitment to China half a month ago. Therefore, in recent times, the United States has been waiting for the results of whether China will increase its holdings of US bonds and whether it will come to Russia's aid. However, the United States could not stop and not oppose China, so Britain came out to be a thug in accordance with its instructions.
In response to the UK's move, on December 6, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in the UK said: We firmly oppose the UK's violation of international law, abuse of unilateral sanctions, and damage to the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies, and have lodged solemn representations with the UK.
In addition, the spokesman of the Chinese Embassy in Britain also exposed and criticized Britain's practice, sternly pointing out: Britain's disregard for domestic and international public opinion has constantly added fuel to the fire, fueling the prolongation of the war and the misery of human lives, making peace even more distant. Instead of reflecting on its own bad deeds, the UK has fabricated accusations to sanction Chinese and other companies, which fully exposes the hypocrisy of the UK.
The spokesman warned the United Kingdom: China will take firm and effective measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises. We would like to inform the British side that any act that undermines China's interests will be resolutely countered by the Chinese side.
So what specific actions should we take to sanction the UK?My point of view is that if you don't make a move, it will hurt Britain to the bone, and you must not "tickle" to fight back.
The first move, the United States, Britain and other countries can directly provide arms aid to Ukraine, why can't China send arms to Russia?Didn't Britain use the excuse that Chinese companies "support the Russian war machine"?Can we swallow the breath of national dignity and national dignity of being bullied by Britain in this way?The freedom of China and Russia**, which country in the world has the right to interfere and govern?Since the UK has sanctioned because of this, then we are giving Russia any commodity in a high-profile manner, as long as it is anything that has nothing to do with nuclear **.
Let the West see that Britain's move is counterproductive, and it will arouse the dissatisfaction of Western countries with Britain, and it will help expand China's export economy and maintain security, so as to avoid the collapse of China after the NATO army defeats Russia, and form an east-west flank posture with Japan.
The second move is to officially declare support for the independence movements in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. We don't have to worry, and we should even hope that Britain will also declare its support for "letting" the ** forces to become more rampant, and we will be more justifiably able to reunify Taiwan. In fact, we must use the idea of dialectics to understand that the support of external forces is the "reverse force" that we need in the current situation. This passage does not need to be explained thoroughly, everyone savor.
The third move is to make every effort to carry out military cooperation with Argentina, once again reiterate its support for Argentina's just action to recover the Malvinas Islands, and even announce that it will assist Argentina in some cutting-edge equipment specifically for the recovery of the Malvinas Islands. I believe that in this case, it will be impossible for the United States to win Argentina over.
The fourth move: join hands with Turkey, Serbia, the United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan to jointly adopt all embargoes against the UK, sever diplomatic relations with the UK, and stop all exchanges. In fact, for China, Britain can be described as a "chicken rib" suffering from infectious diseases in diplomatic relations.
List of high-quality authors