The movie "Founding General Awarded the Title of 1955", as a major historical film, should have been welcomed and supported by the audience, but since its release on November 24, it has suffered a box office fiasco. According to statistics, as of December 1, the cumulative box office of the film was only 600,000, far lower than the level of other films in the same period. This made the film's chief director and starring Tang Guoqiang feel very disappointed and puzzled, and he exclusively responded to this phenomenon in an interview with **, believing that the film schedule was less discriminated against, rather than the quality of the film itself. So, is there any truth to Tang Guoqiang's statement?Is this movie really a good movie?Why is it being treated so coldly?This article will analyze and evaluate this movie from the following aspects, hoping to give you some inspiration and reference.
The movie "Founding General Conferral 1955" is an important historical node based on the first implementation of the title and award of medals in the whole army at the end of September 1955, the film was filmed to commemorate the 130th anniversary of his birth, and it is also another main theme masterpiece of Tang Guoqiang after "The Great Cause of the Founding of the People's Republic of China", "The Great Cause of the Founding of the Party" and "The Great Cause of the Founding of the Army".
The creative significance of the film lies in the fact that it not only restores the heroic deeds and demeanor of the founding generals, but also shows their humanity and emotions, allowing the audience to better understand and admire these heroes who have served the country and the people. The film is also a review and summary of the military system and army building since the founding of New China, embodies the characteristics and advantages of the people's army, and inspires future generations to inherit and carry forward the spirit of the Red Army and strive for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
In terms of artistic expression, the movie "The Title of Founding General 1955" adopts a relatively new and unique narrative style of clipping, discussion and flashback, with distinct personalities and vivid personalities, and real, credible and well-documented historical events.
The film is also careful in the selection of actors, they are all powerful actors, their acting skills and images are very in line with the characteristics of the characters, giving people a strong sense of substitution and shock. The use of the film is also just right, with both passionate military songs, moving love songs, tragic symphonies, and cheerful folk music, which adds a lot of color and atmosphere to the film. Overall, the film is a successful work in terms of artistic expression and deserves praise and recommendation.
Although the movie "The Founding General Awarded the Title of 1955" has a good level in art, it has not received due attention and support in society, with a dismal box office and mediocre reputation, and even received some negative reviews and boycotts. Why is that?The author believes that there are the following reasons:
First, it is the reason for market competition. The release time of the film coincided with the period when many blockbusters at home and abroad were competing to appear, such as "Changjin Lake", "007: No Time to Die", "Eternal Soldier", etc., these films have strong attraction and influence, occupying most of the audience and film schedule, resulting in the suppression and impact of the publicity and screening of "The Founding General Awarded the Title 1955", and it is difficult to get enough ** and attention.
Second, it is the reason for the audience's taste. The subject matter and style of the film, although it has important historical and educational significance, may not be the genre that most viewers are most interested in and favorite for them today. Especially young audiences, they are more inclined to watch some light-hearted, interesting, exciting, thrilling, fantasy and sci-fi films, rather than some serious and heavy films, positive publicity, and main themes. They may not have much understanding and recognition of the stories and spirit of the founding generals, nor do they have much emotion and resonance.
Third, it is the reason for the first orientation. Before and after the release of the film, it also encountered some unfavorable ** and comments, some of which were based on objective evaluation and suggestions for the film, and some were out of malicious smear and attack on the film. For example, some people think that the narrative of the film is too old-fashioned and stereotyped, lacking novelty and creativity, some people think that the film's actor selection is not appropriate and reasonable enough, some people think that the historical restoration of the film is not accurate and comprehensive enough, and some people even think that the theme and content of the film are distorted and beautified by history, and are misleading to the audience. These ** and comments have undoubtedly had a certain impact on the film's reputation and box office.
Fourth, it is the reason for the level of production. Although the film has a certain level of artistic expression, it has many flaws and defects in the production level, which affects the overall quality and perception of the film. For example, the editing of the film is too rough and stiff, resulting in the rhythm and logic of the film not being smooth and clear enough, some scenes and shots appear redundant and abrupt, some details and dialogues seem far-fetched and deliberate, some special effects and props appear low-end and cheap, some actors' performances appear stiff and dull, and some dubbing and sound effects appear incongruous and unnatural. These problems have greatly reduced the appreciability and appeal of the film, and made the audience feel disappointed and dissatisfied.
The movie "Founding General Awarded the Title of 1955" is a film with a lofty creative purpose and significance, but it has encountered an unfortunate market fate and repercussions. It not only shows the heroic demeanor and spirit of the founding generals, but also exposes the flaws and problems in the film's production. It deserves not only our respect and affirmation, but also our criticism and reflection. It is not only a historical textbook that educates us, but also an artistic model that inspires us. It is both a failed commercial work and a successful cultural one.
Dear readers, what do you think and feel about the movie "The Founding General Awarded the Title 1955"?Do you have any comments and suggestions for Tang Guoqiang's response?What are your expectations and requirements for the creation and development of the main theme film?You are welcome to leave a message in the comment area and share your thoughts and thoughts with us. Thank you for reading and have fun!