Misjudging the situation: Affected by employment, students generally chose popular engineering and majors that can enter the system this year, while the scores of publicly-funded normal students have generally increased.
Tang Shangjun chose three popular normal colleges with higher scores than last year.
This shows that he misjudged the situation.
The voluntary filling is unreasonable: the scores of Beijing Normal University and South China Normal University that he applied for are simply not enough, and although Central China Normal University exceeded the minimum submission line of the school last year, the ranking of specific majors is not enough.
This shows that there is an obvious problem with his voluntary filling, which does not seem to be the filling of a veteran who has been filling in the report for 15 years, but more like a deliberate one.
Professional disobedience to adjustment: Tang Shangjun blocked the last road, and could only strive for volunteer recruitment and supplementation.
The last outcome may be that he has no school to continue to repeat, and he will go to an ordinary school for an ordinary major, or a provincial ordinary normal college will admit him for special reasons, and then do publicity.
Therefore, Tang Shangjun's mistakes determine the many undesirable endings he may face.
Tang Shangjun is a young man full of vigor and passion, but he made three serious mistakes in the process of choosing to fill in the volunteers, which led to the result of facing a drop-out.
Hopefully, he can learn from this experience, re-examine his positioning and planning, and make a more informed choice.
This also reminds other students who are about to fill in the volunteer to analyze the situation rationally and objectively, choose their volunteers reasonably, and avoid similar mistakes.
I hope that all students can find their own path and move towards a bright future.