The judgment of the first instance and the appeal were filed.
After the first-instance verdict was pronounced in a "engagement case" in Datong, Shanxi, the defendant was sentenced to 3 years in prison. In court, the man's relative, Ms. Zhen, angrily said that she did not accept the verdict and appealed in court. She believes that her son has been wronged and that the case should be reopened. The judge announced that the trial of the second instance would continue, so that the case was not over and returned to the test of the law.
Netizens discussed and ridiculed.
As soon as the news spread, it immediately sparked a wide discussion on social **. Some netizens expressed their views on the case in a humorous and ridiculous way. Some people joked that they messed up just after they got engaged, and in this case they had to be sentenced to death or shot directly. Some people also questioned the character of the defendant woman, speculating that she may be married for the second time, and even suspected of cheating on marriage and money. These comments have caused quite a bit of controversy and the existence of various points of view.
* Social, moral and legal constraints.
With the case of **, the discussion of immoral behavior in society is also heating up. Some people believe that we should increase the intensity of immoral behaviors such as marriage and money fraud, so that more people can realize the harmfulness of this behavior. At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen the restraint of the law and moral education in order to maintain social harmony and stability. People realize that these unethical behaviors not only harm the interests of others, but also undermine the foundation of trust in society as a whole.
Challenge** and judgment of the court.
Behind the social debate, however, some have begun to question the authenticity of the case and the fairness of the court. They point out that the engagement process is a bit like doing business, and even the contract is certified by handprint. Regarding the question of the lawyer's failure to appear in court, people are asking whether the trial can still be valid. Is it possible that there was an inducement of intent during the trial?These issues make the outcome of the case uncertain. Most people are still looking forward to what will follow, but at the same time acknowledging that the final verdict should be based on the impartiality of the court.