Serbia's ** activity continues, much to the annoyance of Vučić and the Kremlin.
The Serbs persevered, and the ** activity continued, much to the chagrin of Vučić and the Kremlin.
Russian Ambassador to Serbia Khaltchenko commented on the event:
They will continue. Although [the situation] is dangerous, it is under control. Again, our calculation is that as a result of the wider ** activity, it will be possible for the opposition to take the chairmanship of Belgrade ** and its executive bodies. This is crucial, because through Belgrade it is possible to have a very powerful influence on the authorities of the republic," he said.
With such information, it is not surprising. The fact is that the West has such an experience, there are many concrete examples. The first is the pro-EU parade in Ukraine. Of course, Westerners are involved and organize it.
* were fed and nourished – both literally and figuratively.
In addition - organizations, statements from the West, contacts with opponents, incitement to demonstrate on the eve of the elections. For almost six months, they have been carrying out ** activities under various pretexts. ”
Vučić loves Russia very much, and he has a huge interest in Russia, including in the political process. He drew on some of the experiences that we will apply in Serbia. It's a fact. He continued.
Behind the scenes of Serbia's activities are Western intelligence agencies, and new riots are likely.
The leader of the Serbian Radical Party, Vojislav[gf]387[gf]Schery, told the Russian news agency Sputnik that behind the activities of the Serbian opposition are the intelligence services of the West, first of all Germany, and the possibility of new riots cannot be ruled out.
In a social conversation with Russian satellite communications, Sheselly said: "Behind these activities is undoubtedly the intelligence agencies of the West. The German Federal Intelligence Service played a major role this time, with the involvement of American, British and French intelligence agencies. During the attack on the Belgrade City Council building, Serbia** was forced to use force. All this needs to be stopped in time. In the city centre you can do whatever you want, but you can't put very important transport hubs under threat, in which case force is justified. ”
In his opinion, the West is now going to test Serbia ** Aleksandr [gf] 387 [ gf ] Vučić before taking some kind of new action. Supporters of the pro-Western opposition in Serbia have set aside a 24-hour blockade on December 29 of a road leading to the site of the Saturday big event in Belgorod.
"It is possible that the ** event on the streets on Saturday will again reach the level of violence," Sheselly stressed. Western forces simply want to force Vučić to abandon Kosovo, to abandon support for the Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to impose sanctions against Russia. That would mean the end of Vučić's career. ”
Sheselly said that the current events are like the ** event in 2000, when the Serbian ** Slobodan [gf] 2022 [ gf] Milosevic was ousted**.
British media: The United States proposes that the G7** confiscate Russia's frozen assets, but Germany, France and Italy have reservations.
Germany, France, Italy and the European Union have reservations about the idea of the United States proposing to confiscate $300 billion worth of Russian assets, arguing that it is necessary to first assess the legality of the measure, citing sources, the Financial Times on December 28.
The U.S. has proposed that the G7 countries set up a working group on how to seize $300 billion in assets frozen by Russia. The United States, with the support of the United Kingdom, Japan and Canada, has proposed to prepare a scenario for the confiscation of Russian assets for the possible G7 meeting at the end of February 2024.
The European Union, the United Kingdom and France stressed that obtaining confiscated funds is not easy and insufficient to meet Ukraine's reconstruction needs. In addition, the countries noted that the seizure of Russian assets should not be detrimental to the provision of financial support to Kyiv in 2024.
The EU currently lacks a legal basis for the confiscation of private property of citizens and companies of Russia and Belarus. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union does not allow the confiscation of private property unless it is in the "public interest", but even in this case, the owner must receive fair and timely compensation.
Russia previously responded that freezing Russian assets in Europe was theft, and pointed out that the EU was targeting not only private funds, but also Russian state assets. I'm going to be hot