On September 12, 1948, the Liaoshen Campaign broke out, and the ** in the Northeast was in trouble, but it ended in a fiasco. The situation is passive, the troops are inferior, and the trump card troops are unbelievably defeated. What was the reason for such a tragic ending?
Before the Liaoshen Campaign, ** was isolated in several large cities, and the disadvantages were obvious. Despite having the two ace troops of the new one and the new six, this battle has become a footnote to the fiasco. In this battle, a total of 470,000 enemies were annihilated and 186 officers above the rank of major general were captured, a tragic result that caused many questions and thoughts.
Lao Chiang's decision-making mistakes led to defeatThe truth behind it**.
The key to the Liaoshen campaign did not come from the comparison of forces, but from the misunderstandings hidden in the command decision. The key points of this battle highlighted Chiang's mistakes, and his assessment of the battle situation and his command decisions were seriously lacking, which led to a painful defeat.
* With elite aces, such as Xinyi and Xinliu, he has shown extraordinary combat power on the battlefield of India and Burma. However, in the Liaoshen Campaign, Lao Chiang's interventional command became a fatal shortcoming. He stubbornly overestimated his own military capabilities and frequently interfered with the commands of his subordinates, which had serious consequences.
At the critical juncture, Lao Jiang made two serious mistakes. The first was to appoint Hou Jingru as the commander of the Eastern Advance Corps, rather than a more suitable candidate. Hou Jingru's performance on the battlefield was far from Lao Chiang's expectations, and his judgment and actions on the battle situation were not only uncoordinated, but also affected the coordination and combat effectiveness of the troops.
The second was the long-range command of Liao Yaoxiang, and Lao Chiang constantly asked his troops to speed up, but ignored the complexity of the actual battlefield situation. Liao's suggestion was not adopted, and if Liao's suggestion had been adopted at that time, the Westward Advance Corps might have been able to avoid a fiasco.
Poor decision-making and the reasons behind it.
Lao Chiang's stubbornness and excessive intervention in his subordinates exposed the weak links in command decision-making during the Liaoshen Campaign. There are obvious flaws in his assessment of the battle situation and his decision-making judgment, ignoring the actual situation of the troops and the complexity of the battlefield, resulting in the development of the war situation in an unfavorable direction.
This fiasco not only exposed Chiang's personal shortcomings, but also highlighted the serious consequences of poor decision-making in military command. If the decision-making at that time had been adjusted, perhaps the outcome of the Liaoshen campaign would have been completely different.
Reflections and lessons behind the war.
The disastrous defeat in the Liaoshen Campaign reminds us that military decision-making is not based on individual ability alone, but also requires comprehensive and objective judgment of the battle situation and rational decision-making. Reflection on history has made us more profoundly aware of the enormous consequences that can be brought about by mistakes in decision-making in war.
Lao Jiang's mistake has become the biggest shortcoming of the fiasco, but it is more of a deep reflection on the command decision-making level. War has taught us that military decision-making should not ignore the actual situation, and more importantly, it is necessary to think from multiple angles and in an all-round way in order to avoid major mistakes.
The Battle of Liaoshen was a key battle in the Chinese Liberation War, and the far-reaching impact of its defeat is still worthy of our in-depth reflection and reflection. The discussion presented in the article pays special attention to the decision-making mistakes under the leadership of Lao Chiang, which played a key role in the battle and led to the fiasco of **.
First of all, the fiasco of the Liaoshen Campaign tells us that there are complex military and political factors behind the war. Even if the best has first-class elite troops in battle, the decisions of the leadership directly affect the direction of the entire battle. As a commander, Lao Jiang's overestimation of his personal military ability and excessive interference in the command of the troops exacerbated the predicament of the first on the battlefield, which was clearly demonstrated in the article.
Second, for military leaders, poor decision-making can lead to serious consequences. Lao Jiang's stubbornness and excessive interference with his subordinates exposed his shortcomings as a leader at the decision-making level. In the Liaoshen Campaign, his decision-making did not fully consider the actual situation on the battlefield, ignoring the coordination and tactical layout of the troops, which led to the weakening of the first on the battlefield and the final fiasco.
In addition, the article also highlights the need for teamwork and a rational command structure in military command. Lao Chiang's unilateral decision-making and excessive intervention in the command of the troops, and the disconnection from the actual situation, ultimately led to a lack of effective coordination and cooperation on the battlefield. This underscores the need for leaders to work closely with their teams in military operations, to make decisions together, and to respect the realities of the situation.
Overall, this article provides an in-depth analysis and reflection on the defeat of the Liaoshen Campaign and the decision-making mistakes behind it. These reviews of military history help us gain a deeper understanding of the connection between decisions and outcomes in warfare, as well as important factors for leaders to be aware of in military decision-making.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!