On January 15, 2009, in Xintang District, Guangzhou City, 23-year-old woman Zhang Lu died mysteriously, and her boyfriend Chen Zhuohao became the culpritDeath penalty in the first instance, acquittal in the second instance!Where is the truth?
In January 2009, a rental house in Xintang District, Guangzhou City, became the birthplace of a bizarre mystery. The death of Zhang Lu, a 23-year-old woman, shocked the whole city, and the twists and turns of the fate of her boyfriend Chen Zhuohao in the case were even more touching.
Figure 1: Mysterious death of his girlfriend.
That afternoon, Chen Zhuohao and his friend Yang Fan went to look for his missing girlfriend and found that everything was in order in Zhang Lu's rental house. The door lock was intact, and the clothes and belongings were complete, but Zhang Lu had closed his eyes forever. **'s investigation seems to point to the only suspect at first, Chen Zhuohao.
Figure 2: The scene of the crime.
The cause of Zhang Lu's death was confirmed to be mechanical asphyxiation, while her mouth and nose were covered, and a tranquilizer was detected in her body. Chen Zhuohao became the focus of attention, although the door lock of the rental house was not picked, and the balcony was also closed.
Figure 3: Chen Zhuohao's new life.
Chen Zhuohao, after graduating from university, chose to stay in Guangzhou to make a living, however, his new life became gloomy after the mysterious death of his girlfriend. The two met at a hometown meeting, had a tortuous relationship, and had dinner together two days before the crime. ** Some puzzling clues were uncovered during the investigation.
Figure 4: After dinner for three.
Two days before the incident, Chen Zhuohao, Zhang Lu and Yang Fan had dinner together, however, a quarrel seemed to be a turning point. Zhang Lu was angry that there was no hot water to take a bath and left Chen Zhuohao's home. **'s investigation aroused suspicion of Chen Zhuohao, especially the key clue found on him - Zhang Lu's satchel.
Figure 5: Key clues surfaced.
* Zhang Lu's satchel was found at Chen Zhuohao's home, which contained personal items such as mobile phones and bank cards. This discovery makes the case confusing, why did Zhang Lu's belongings appear in Chen Zhuohao's home?The possibility of Chen Zhuohao becoming a suspect is rising.
Figure 6: Boyfriend pleads guilty to killing his girlfriend.
A month after the incident, Chen Zhuohao was arrested, and he was charged with intentional homicide. In the first trial, Chen Zhuohao suddenly admitted the crime and confessed his guilt. He described his last night with Zhang Lu, claiming that after an argument, he accidentally covered his girlfriend's mouth and nose with his hand.
Figure 7: Boyfriend suddenly admitted.
Chen's confession of guilt became key evidence in court, and his sudden confession raised doubts. However, what is even more shocking is that after the first-instance verdict, Chen Zhuohao retracted his confession and appealed, saying that he was forced by investigators to admit his guilt. The case entered an unexpected phase.
Figure 8: Suspected of being a forced confession
After the first-instance verdict, Chen's defense lawyer appealed, saying that Chen's guilty confession was coerced and signed by investigators. After investigation, the court found that the contents of the two guilty confessions were highly similar, and the date errors were exactly the same. This calls into question the veracity of confessions of guilt, which were originally key evidence.
Figure 9: Key evidentiary issues.
The court re-examined the key evidentiary issues in the case, particularly the transcript of Chen Zhuohao. Experts found that the contents of the two guilty confessions were highly similar, and Chen Zhuohao's signature on the medical examination report when he was taken away for interrogation was also confirmed to be not signed by himself.
Figure 10: Retrial of the judgment.
In 2014, the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court issued a retrial verdict upholding the first-instance death sentence. However, the complexity of the mystery remains unrevealed. Chen Zhuohao was not satisfied with the verdict and appealed again, uncovering more mysteries in the case.
Figure 11: Both transcripts are of the same height.
In the second instance, the court focused on examining Chen Zhuohao's two incriminating confessions and found that their contents were highly similar, and the date errors were almost identical. The discovery once again raised questions about whether the investigators were forcing Mr. Chen. Chen Zhuohao's defense lawyer stressed that the confession was only the investigator's judgment on the facts of the case, and did not have objectivity and legitimacy, and should be excluded.
Figure 12: Evidence is invalid, and the verdict is acquitted after serving six years.
In the end, the court found Chen Zhuohao's guilty confession as illegal evidence, and the case was re-examined. In addition to the issue of transcripts, the court also found forged signatures on medical examination reports. On May 18, 2015, Chen Zhuohao's six-year unjust imprisonment was finally revealed, and the Guangdong Provincial High People's Court acquitted him.
The truth of this bizarre mystery case gradually emerged, and the six years of unjust imprisonment spent by Chen Zhuohao in prison became the focus of social attention. The mystery sheds light on the problems in the justice system and makes people reflect on the careful handling of evidence. The resolution of unjust cases is a victory for justice, and it also warns us that we should protect the rights and interests of the defendants and ensure the fairness of justice when facing complex cases.
Through vivid and detailed descriptions, this article shows a bizarre ** and its subsequent judicial process. The whole case is full of suspense and twists and turns, which makes people fall into the pursuit and thinking of the truth. From the mysterious death of the woman Zhang Lu at the beginning, to the accusation of her boyfriend Chen Zhuohao as **, and then to his first-instance death penalty and second-instance acquittal, the whole process is like a bizarre movie plot, fascinating.
First of all, the article provides readers with a more intuitive crime scene and related evidence through the insertion of ** in the narrative. This multi-** presentation makes it easier for readers to immerse themselves in the storyline, adding to the credibility and engaging effect of the story. Through the illustrations, readers can feel the scene more intuitively and deepen their understanding of the case.
Secondly, the article provides a detailed analysis of the course of the case, from the initial investigation to Chen Zhuohao's guilty confession, and then to the final acquittal, every link presents the complexity of the case. In particular, Chen Zhuohao's retraction of his confession during the review process, as well as details such as the wrong date in the guilty confession, made the whole case confusing. For readers, this not only raises doubts about the truth, but also prompts deep thinking about judicial impartiality.
It is worth noting that in the process of discussing Chen Zhuohao's accusation of **, the article emphasizes that his guilty confession may have been produced under the pressure of investigators, and through the revelation of the high similarity of the two transcripts, it arouses readers' concerns about judicial fairness. This concern not only stops at the case itself, but also involves issues such as whether there is torture to extract confessions in the judicial system, which further guides readers to think deeply about judicial fairness.
Finally, the article emphasizes Chen Zhuohao's six years of unjust imprisonment through the description of the outcome of the case. Such an outcome is not only a redress for the wronged, but also a revelation of the problems in the judicial system. Through such cases, people's trust in the judiciary may be shaken to a certain extent, and the call for ensuring judicial fairness will be stronger.
Overall, the essay succeeds in drawing the reader into a suspenseful and reflective story situation through vivid narration, detailed analysis, and thought-provoking discourse. Although the truth of the case is revealed, the reflection on the judicial system will accompany the reader for a long time.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!