In the last years of the Qing Dynasty, it was widely believed that the Qing army was corrupt and incompetent, and it was frequently defeated. Some people have raised the question of whether replacing the Qing army with a disciplined and heroic army like the Qin Dynasty would be able to reverse the defeat in the battle of the Eight-Nation AllianceHowever, a deep analysis of the specific situation at that time shows that the ending is still doomed to failure and cannot change the general trend of history.
The Qing army's ** equipment surpassed that of the Qin army.
Some people often mistakenly believe that the Qing army was backward in equipment and could only use broadswords and spears when fighting with the Eight-Nation Alliance, while the Qin army's arrow array was powerful and could crush the Qing army. This is not the case.
In terms of equipment, the Qing army is indeed inferior to the Eight-Nation Alliance, but it is also equipped with a large number of hot equipment, including guns and artillery, which is both hot and cold. In contrast, the Qin army could only use strong bows and crossbows and broadswords and spears, and the gap in equipment between the Qing army and the Qin army was even greater than the gap with the Eight-Nation Alliance.
The reason for the defeat of the Qing army was not the lack of bravery.
Some people believe that the Qin army was highly motivated and courageous, and it was better than the Qing army. In fact, the Qing army was just as brave, and many officers and soldiers died heroically in foreign wars.
For example, Guan Tianpei, Ge Yunfei, Chen Huacheng, Hailing and others in the First Opium War, Sha Yuanchun, Leshan and others in the Second Opium War, Deng Shichang and others in the First Sino-Japanese War, and Nie Shicheng and Luo Rongguang in the Eight-Nation Alliance's War of Aggression against China. Compared with some of the surrenderers during the War of Resistance Against Japan, there were almost no examples of the Qing army surrendering as traitors. The defeat of the Qing army was not due to a lack of bravery, but to problems with the ruling class at that time.
Under the general trend of history, it is difficult for individual factors to change the outcome.
In the face of the general trend of history, it is difficult to change only a few factors. If there is a problem in the rule of the Qing Dynasty, even if it changes an army, adjusts the generals, or even changes the supreme ruler, it is difficult to change the trend of history. No matter which army of the feudal dynasty the Qing army was replaced, the final outcome could not be changed.
Conclusion. With a full understanding of the military situation in the last years of the Qing Dynasty, we can conclude that even if the Qing army was replaced by the disciplined and heroic Qin army, due to historical limitations and the constraints of strategic and tactical thinking, it was still doomed to defeat in the face of the Eight-Nation Alliance. History tells us that at critical moments, individual heroism cannot change the overall trend, but must fundamentally solve the problem in order to truly change the course of history.
The defeat of the army in the face of the Eight-Nation Coalition in the last years of the Qing Dynasty not only provoked the thinking of historians, but also stimulated public attention to this period. As pointed out above, even if the Qing army is replaced by the Qin army, the outcome is still difficult to change, and the views discussed in it are quite pertinent and worth pondering.
First of all, for the discussion of equipment, the article pointed out that the Qing army was not inferior to the Eight-Nation Coalition Army in hot equipment, which was unusual. Such details reveal some overlooked truths in history. For our contemporaries, in the era of advanced technology, it is often thought that advanced ** can ensure victory in the war. However, history tells us that the factors that determine victory or defeat are far from being limited to whether they are advanced or not, but are more related to the overall quality of the military and the decision-making level of the leadership.
Secondly, as for the analysis of the reasons for the defeat of the Qing army, the article emphatically points out that it was not that the Qing army was not brave, but that there was a problem with the ruling class. This point of view profoundly reveals the internal reasons for the defeat of the war, that is, the problems of the leadership. In the military, the level of leadership and decision-making were crucial, and the leadership problems at the end of the Qing Dynasty were one of the main reasons for the defeat. This is also instructive for today's society, where the quality and competence of the leadership determine the fate of a country or organization in the face of adversity.
Finally, the article emphasizes the difficulty of individual factors in changing the outcome under the general trend of history. This view expresses the idea of historical materialism, that is, history exists objectively, and it is difficult for a single individual or factor to change the overall trend. This also has important implications for us to understand the development law of historical events and think about the current social changes.
Overall, this article provides us with profound historical reflections through an in-depth analysis of the reasons for the army's defeat in the last years of the Qing Dynasty. In today's society, we can also learn from this and be wary of leadership issues, blind worship of technology supremacy, and misperceptions of historical trends. History is the best textbook, and through in-depth study of history, we can better understand our past, understand the present, and accumulate valuable experience for future development.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!