Experts call for curriculum adjustments, students' rights and interests are damaged, and teachers have long been impatient!
Experts call for curriculum adjustments, students' rights and interests are damaged, and teachers have long been impatient!
First of all, experts call for the cancellation of this class: it is meaningless and violates the rights of students, teachers: they have had enough for a long time!
Wang Xuming, an education expert, recently expressed his views on the cancellation of open classes, saying that the cancellation of open classes is not only meaningless, but also an infringement of students' rights and interests. His views have been widely discussed and controversial. As a form of teaching, open classes have certain advantages and purposes in their own right. However, as time went on, the open class gradually evolved into a scene where both teachers and students felt tired and exhausted. Now, let's look at the current state of open classes from the perspective of teachers and students.
Teacher's dilemma: Open classes become a pressure and burden.
Open classes are a sight for teachers and need to be carefully prepared in advance. There were leaders and other teachers in the audience to evaluate and guide the class, which added a lot of pressure to the teachers. From expressions to sentences, every detail has to be scrutinized repeatedly, which is undoubtedly worse for teachers who are already busy with work. In addition, teachers had to rehearse repeatedly in order for the open classes to run smoothly, which also slowed down the progress of other classes. What was supposed to be an open class to improve the quality of teaching and correct mistakes has now turned into a farce. For some sensitive students, this kind of deceptive behavior can lead to psychological problems and deviate from the original purpose of education.
Students' dilemma: Open classes become a waste of time and energy.
For students, they need to spend a lot of time rehearsing lessons with teachers before public classes. They must repeatedly practice lessons that they are already familiar with and Xi them with the teacher. Sometimes, the teacher prepares questions with obvious answers, and students just need to pretend to be serious. These performances waste valuable students' time and energy and slow down other courses. The students realized that this kind of performance was just to curry favor with the leader, and they all knew it, but they did not dare to say it. For the more sensitive students, this hypocrisy can have a negative psychological impact. The whole process goes against the original purpose of education and becomes a drama disguised as education.
Repositioning and refurbishing open classrooms.
Although there are some problems with open classes, there is nothing inherently wrong with the format of open classes, and it is reasonable as a place to show the strength of teachers. However, the number of open classes should be kept within a reasonable range, and appropriate teachers should be selected to demonstrate their teaching methods and professional skills. Experienced teachers and class teachers who are already busy with their work should be exempt from open classes. In addition, the quality and quantity of open classes should not be used as a grading criterion, lest teachers treat open classes as some kind of terrible exam. Only in this way can the open class return to its essence and restore its original value.
Conclusion. As a form of teaching, open classes should be a platform for teachers to exchange learning Xi with each other, with the purpose of ensuring the quality of teaching. However, the current form of open classes has lost its value and has become an infringement on the rights and interests of teachers and students. Therefore, we need to reform and reorient the Open Course to return it to its original purpose and meaning. Only in this way can we make greater contributions to the development of education.