Who is responsible for supervising the village cadres?The close relationship between the supervisory committee and the village cadres was revealed
Supervision of village-level organizations by village-level supervisory committees and village-level organizations.
In order to strengthen supervision and restraint over grassroots cadres, a system of "village committees" has been established. However, in recent years, the leader of the villagers' group has enjoyed the same welfare and welfare as the villagers, and has been integrated with the villagers in their work, resulting in the failure of the villagers' group's supervisory function to be truly brought into play. They also have to go to work and get off work, and they are all with the people in the village, and this situation is difficult for people to understand. In this case, will the Ombudsman be able to continue to carry out his oversight responsibilities?
Let's think about it, what's going on?In other words, who is it that "binds" the Supervisory Committee to the villagers' group?One is out of expectation of superiors, hoping to reach a high consensus between the village committee and the director of the village committee, so as to achieve better governance results. Second, it is influenced by local factors, on the one hand, to enable rural grassroots cadres to play a better role, on the other hand, to ensure the stability of rural grassroots political power, and on the other hand, to improve the operational efficiency of rural grassroots political power. But in any case, the "same thing" is not in line with the purpose of the village-level organization.
The relationship between the village committee and the village committee and the existing problems.
Villagers' committees are self-governing institutions of the people that villagers self-manage, educate and serve. Discipline inspection and supervision at the village level is an organizational form that facilitates the masses in handling affairs and realizes democratic supervision. In China's Organic Law on Villagers' Committees, villagers' committees cannot enjoy the same status as villagers' committees.
However, there are also some localities that practice the practice of integrating the "two committees" into one. This setting doesn't have any practical value, and sometimes it can be counterproductive. In rural governance, village committees represent the greatest authority and are also the best objects of democratic supervision. Too many organizational structures not only affect the effectiveness of the work, but also affect the enthusiasm of the peasant households, and in practice, there is also a phenomenon of shirking responsibility from each other.
Problems and countermeasures in the adjustment of village-level team members.
In recent years, some localities have interfered in rural affairs, especially the selection and appointment of rural cadres. This practice violates the relevant provisions of the Organic Law of Villagers' Committees. We should put more energy into rural revitalization and the prosperity of farmers, and not just put on a show in the organs and engage in formalism. It is necessary to solve practical difficulties for them and make their lives better.
In order to fundamentally solve the problems existing in the building of political power at the grassroots level in rural areas, it is necessary to strengthen the mechanism for selecting and employing people in village-level organizations and ensure that the elections are fair, reasonable, and in accordance with procedures. On this basis, it is necessary to further improve the system of general elections for village-level organizations, so that peasant households can give full play to their main role in the general elections. Only in this way can we ensure the normal development of all work, ensure the effective development of rural construction, and enable the peasants to receive tangible benefits.
My own thoughts and conclusions.
From the perspective of "rural revitalization strategy", this article explains "who will supervise the village secretary?".With regard to the controversy between the "Supervisory Committee" and the "Village Committee" and the "Two Village Committees" "in collusion," the author has the following thoughts and summaries.
First of all, in order to ensure the normal operation of village-level organizations, it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of village-level supervisory organs to ensure the independence and impartiality of village-level organizations. The Head of the JISC must have sufficient strength and motivation to carry out self-reflection and carry out the monitoring work.
Second, it is necessary to further clarify the interconnection between villagers' committees and villagers' committees, and make adjustments in strict accordance with the relevant requirements of the "Organic Law on Villagers' Committees" so as to ensure that the autonomous rights of villagers' committees are not infringed upon.
Third, it is necessary to strictly follow the relevant systems and procedures to ensure that the election is fair, reasonable, and transparent. On this basis, it is necessary to enhance the concept and degree of participation of peasant households, so that they can better participate in the general elections of village-level organizations, so as to promote the healthy development of rural undertakings.
At the same time, it is necessary to attach importance to the practical problems in the rural areas, effectively solve their practical problems, let them live a better life, and promote the rejuvenation and development of the rural areas.