Title: Scholz "cries poor" Putin actually saves the scene!Europe's natural gas beach rush has triggered a "hurricane".
Europe under the gas storm: Scholz cried that Putin saved the scene!
This is a ridiculous European moment, Scholz actually complained that Russia was cutting off gas**, making Germany seem to be the victim. The story is absurd, and the EU's performance in this gas storm is even more chilling.
Scholz's contradictory remarks are simply laughable. He once declared that "Germany is completely rid of Russian gas", but now he complains that Russia "stops gas to Europe and Germany", blaming this for the energy crisis on the European continent. This begs the question, who is actually creating this crisis?Isn't it Germany itself?
It is undeniable that the pressure of the international energy crisis is increasing, especially as winter approaches, European natural gas consumption soars, and countries such as Germany have to activate terminal reserves to rescue emergencies at a time when relations with Russia are tense. However, Scholz chose to send a "distress signal" to Russia at this time. It's really incredible.
As Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, said, Scholz went so far as to put the blame on Russia, instead of reflecting on his country's responsibility for the Nord Stream 1 2 submarine gas pipeline. This makes one wonder when politicians' sense of responsibility will outweigh their political self-interest
What is even more infuriating is that the EU's actions have made a mess of it. On the issue of gas regulations, EU member states could not agree on it. The divisions between Brussels and its member states, especially on issues related to the economy and livelihoods, have pale in the face of the EU. This situation raises the question of what kind of group the EU is and what kind of hope they can bring to Europe
Netizens also expressed their opinions on this scene. Someone joked: "Scholz didn't eat, one time he said that he would sever relations with Russia, and the other he cried poor and begged for help." Someone else sarcastically said: "Could it be that Scholz wants Putin to send a big gift package?"”
It is not difficult to see from this series of reactions that Scholz's words and deeds are really puzzling. The contradiction and hypocrisy of preaching a break from Russia's energy dependence on the one hand and turning to Russia for help in a time of crisis on the other hand is undoubtedly disappointing.
The gas storm in Europe not only makes people lament the helplessness of politics, but also shows us the reality of international relations. In this world, the interests of countries are constantly playing, and the people often become a tool for politicians to shirk their responsibilities.
This is reminiscent of China's firm stance on solving energy problems. China has always advocated the principles of equality, mutual benefit and win-win, and has ensured domestic energy through cooperation with other countries. This positive attitude and pragmatic actions stand in stark contrast to Europe's hypocrisy.
In international relations, the contrast between sincerity and hypocrisy is clear. China's commitment to peaceful coexistence, while some countries have chosen to shirk their responsibilities in the face of difficult situations, raises questions about the authenticity of international politics.
The gas storm in Europe has taught us a lesson and made us more aware of the complexities and competing interests in international relations. At such a moment, we should keep a clear head, be rational and discerning enough in dealing with international affairs, and not be deceived by hypocritical appearances.
In this gas crisis, China's firm stance and pragmatic cooperation approach are deeply gratifying. And Europe's performance raises some questions about its international role. Perhaps, this is also an opportunity for us to look at international affairs more rationally and distinguish between right and wrong.
When Scholz cried that Putin came to the rescue, Russia decisively sent gas to Europe through the gas pipeline in Ukraine, and also to some European countries through the Turkish Stream. This decision is not only Putin's "kindness", but also an ingenious arrangement of international politics.
Russia's response was ingenious. The delivery of 42.2 million cubic meters of natural gas per day to Europe not only helps alleviate Europe's energy crisis, but also wins a political initiative on the international stage. Ukraine is in a desperate situation under the reduction of Western military aid to Ukraine, and Putin's support measures come at the right time. This not only helps to safeguard Russia's strategic interests on the Ukraine issue, but also brings a ray of warmth to Europe's cold winter.
Putin's actions this time are actually a display of political wisdom. By increasing gas deliveries to Europe, it will not only help to exacerbate the differences between EU countries and Brussels, but also divide the US-EU alliance in support of Ukraine. Putin is well versed in the mysteries of international politics, and his actions have not only contributed to Russia's economic development, but also strategically restrained the West.
What is even more noteworthy is that this "kindness" action not only has an impact on international politics, but also means that Putin is willing to help Europe safely survive the cold winter at the end of the conflict in Ukraine, creating favorable conditions for post-war reconstruction and economic cooperation.
In general, in this gas storm, Putin's measures have not only been skillfully maneuvered in international politics, but have also left a far-reaching impact on economic cooperation and international relations. In contrast, Europe's helplessness in the face of the energy crisis, as well as the contradictory rhetoric of some politicians, makes one sigh at the complexity of international politics.
At this time of change, China's firm stance and pragmatic approach to cooperation have become a bright spot for the international community. And some of Europe's performances have become a profound lesson. Perhaps, we should adopt a more rational attitude towards international affairs, keep a clear head about international relations, and at the same time distinguish between right and wrong, and abandon hypocrisy and short-sightedness.
In this world, every country should be responsible for international affairs, treat other countries sincerely, and promote world peace and stability with concrete actions. I hope that in future international relations, we will see more cases of mutual respect and equal cooperation, instead of the chaos created by some politicians for short-term political gain. This may be the path that the international community really wants.