The state of Zhao was defeated in the Battle of Changping, leaving an indelible stain on the long river of history. However, the blame for the Battle of Changping did not entirely fall on Zhao Kuo, a young general.
Young Zhao Kuo: My father is looking forward to future achievements.
Zhao Kuo was young and promising at the time, and his father had high hopes for him, believing that after a few years of training, he would become a real general. This assessment shows that Zhao Kuo's responsibility in the Battle of Changping was not entirely unreasonable.
The trust and gambling of King Xiaocheng.
King Zhao Xiaocheng was young and had little understanding of state affairs, so he chose to trust Zhao Kuo and sent him to command the front. Zhao Kuo's rhetoric was arrogant, but King Xiaocheng still chose to believe him, coupled with his own lack of governance of the country, which was also one of the reasons for the defeat in the Battle of Changping.
Fatal mistake: Zhao Kuo's ineffective command.
Zhao Kuo failed to effectively command in the Battle of Changping and failed to see through the trap set by Bai Qi, resulting in the annihilation of more than 400,000 troops of the Zhao army. The responsibility is certainly on Zhao Kuo, but King Zhao Xiaocheng also cannot escape the main responsibility.
The truth of the war: the battle for the land of the party.
The Shangdang region was strategically important, and King Zhaoxiang of Qin launched the Battle of Changping in order to seize the Shangdang region and cut off its ties with Korea. However, South Korea ceded the Shangdang region, and the common people were unwilling to give in, and they were troubled for a while.
Zhao Xiaocheng's hesitation and **.
King Zhao Xiaocheng was greedy in the face of the seventeen cities in the Shangdang region. However, if this area was accepted, it would offend the Qin state and would inevitably lead to a war with the Qin state, and King Zhao Xiaocheng would be in a dilemma.
The controversy between the two factions: accept or abandon the party?
There were two factions of opinion within the Zhao state, one side believed that the competition for the Shangdang region would outweigh the losses, and the other side believed that it was a rare opportunity. In this controversy, King Zhao Xiaocheng hesitated.
The wise man's proposal: the old general Lian Po should be in this important role.
Zhao Sheng suggested that the old general Lian Po lead the army, and King Zhao Xiaocheng finally let go of the hesitation in his heart and decided to seize the Shangdang area. However, at this time, King Zhao Xiaocheng only looked at personal interests, not the fate of the country.
War is inescapable: it is best to choose to seize the party.
Zhao's attitude towards the war was inappropriate from the beginning, but under the system at that time, the main responsibility should have been given to King Zhao Xiaocheng. If he abandoned Shangdang, Qin would threaten the west and east of Zhao, putting Zhao in a passive position.
The ending is not satisfactory: the narrow-mindedness of King Zhao Xiaocheng.
From the very beginning, King Zhao Xiaocheng had a wrong attitude towards the war, and he only considered his personal interests rather than the long-term fate of the country. In this lost war, the culprit should not simply be blamed on Zhao Kuo alone.
Epilogue: The tragic past of the young general.
The fiasco in the Battle of Changping left a profound lesson, and Zhao Kuo became the object of criticism and criticism, however, we cannot ignore the narrow-mindedness of King Zhao Xiaocheng and his neglect of the long-term interests of the country. Behind this tragedy, both the young general and the young monarch have an unshirkable responsibility.
In the Battle of Changping, the imprint of history was deeply engraved on the fate of the Zhao State. In this lost war, Zhao Kuo became a much-criticized representative, however, a closer examination of this period of history, we cannot ignore the narrow-mindedness of King Zhao Xiaocheng and his neglect of the long-term interests of the country.
First of all, Zhao Kuo, as a young general, undertook the arduous task of commanding the front line. His father had good hopes that he would become a true general after a few years of training. However, Zhao Kuo was young and vigorous, and his rhetoric was arrogant, and he failed to command effectively in the Battle of Changping, which eventually led to the defeat of Zhao's army. For him personally, this is undoubtedly a huge blow, but it is still worth pondering whether he should be blamed for the entire defeat.
Secondly, King Zhao Xiaocheng's narrow-mindedness played a crucial role in the entire war. The young monarch lacked a comprehensive understanding of state governance, the use of the army, diplomacy, and economic and agricultural construction. He chose to believe in Zhao Kuo's young general, more out of uncertainty about national affairs and lack of his own ability. King Zhao's greed for the Shangdang region and his behavior of putting the interests of the country above his own selfish desires ultimately led to the defeat of Zhao.
The controversy between the two factions within Zhao also undermined the contradictory perception of the country's future direction to a certain extent. One side believes that the competition for the Shangdang region is worth the loss, while the other side sees it as a rare opportunity. The indecision of King Zhao Xiaocheng caused Zhao to lose its unified strategic thinking at a critical moment, further weakening its ability to respond to war.
In the context of this history, the defeat of Zhao seems to have been not only a military defeat, but also a disaster under the country's governance system. King Zhao's narrow-mindedness and neglect of the country's long-term interests made Zhao appear weak in the face of foreign enemies. The fiasco of the Battle of Changping not only made Zhao Kuo bear a heavy historical responsibility, but also cast a heavy shadow on the fate of Zhao.
Therefore, for this period of history, we cannot simply put the blame on Zhao Kuo alone. Instead, the country's governance system, the capabilities of its leaders, and the decision-making process should be examined to understand the truth of the Battle of Changping from a more comprehensive perspective. The lesson of this war is that the rise and fall of a country is closely related to the wisdom and determination of the monarch, and that only through comprehensive, scientific governance and wise decision-making can the long-term stability of the country be ensured.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!