In 1951, the Tianjin ** case was exposed, and **Shan and Zhang Zishan were **17.1 billion yuan during their tenure, equivalent to 1** of 10,000 fighter jets. At that time, it was the Korean War, and ordinary people were working hard to support the front line. As soon as he received the report, he was furious and directly ordered to correct the law on the spot. Huang Jing, secretary of the Tianjin Municipal Party Committee, interceded for the two in private, hoping to show mercy considering that they had made contributions to the country and had a family, wife and children. But *** is unwavering, and the two deserve it. Under Huang Jing's repeated pleas, ** agreed to convey the plea, but ***'s response was very decisive, and it was absolutely impossible to be extrajudicial to be gracious. In the end, Liu and Zhang were sentenced to death and executed.
The second scandal is even more nonsense, saying that *** denied *** in many conversations in his later years, **regarded *** as his own, and promoted him to the **committee at the age of 37. If there is no *** and the party's support, there will be no *** political career. In his later years, his health deteriorated, and at the age of 97, he was no longer able to speak independently, let alone conduct the so-called "nineteen conversations". This is a complete fabrication to discredit *** and *** and should be severely punished. Bo's children stressed in a statement that before their father's death, they repeatedly said that without the party and the party, there would be no prosperity in China today.
The incident quickly sparked heated discussions on the Internet. Some netizens believe that ** does not consider any personal feelings, and severely punishes ** Liu and Zhang, which fully reflects his honest style. In the face of Huang Jing's repeated pleas, ** did not relent, adhered to principles, and was admirable. Some netizens also believe that ** was weak in his later years, and it was simply unrealistic to participate in the so-called conversation, which was a complete smear lie. However, some netizens still questioned whether helping to convey the plea back then played a certain role in Liu and Zhang. In this regard, some comments pointed out that according to ***'s character and principles of doing things, Huang Jing's plea is likely to be ineffective. The key is to defend the truth and not let rumors run into problems.
This article focuses on the statement issued by *** in 2007 to clarify the truth about two rumors about his father. The first rumor involving Bo Wei's corruption and Zhang Zishan's intercession has been proven to be untrue. The second said that Bo talked many times in his later years and denied ***, which was a complete fabrication. **Always have high respect for ***. The purpose of these rumors is to discredit *** and *** children cannot tolerate this kind of behavior that slanders the reputation of their parents. By describing the truth of the scandal, the article expresses the position of defending history and safeguarding the reputation of the ancestors. This sparked a wide discussion among netizens. In the future, it is necessary to continue to study and unearth the truth of history, and resolutely resist historical nihilism and any act of spreading falsehood. How do you think you can find a balance between defending the truth and protecting your reputation in today's environment?We look forward to hearing from you.