As the 20th anniversary of 911 approaches, the U.S. defeat in Afghanistan is in the global spotlight. There were rumors that the Taliban would hold a temporary inauguration ceremony, which caused dissatisfaction in the United States. However, Inamullah Samangani, a member of the Taliban's Cultural Council, clarified that the ceremony was cancelled and denied previous rumors.
If the Taliban chooses to hold a ceremony on 911 day, it will be seen as a provocation to the United States, or even a powerful gesture against terrorist groups. However, the Taliban have expressed their willingness to establish diplomatic relations with the United States, hoping to be recognized. Despite humiliating the U.S. military many times, it is not advisable to joke about 911.
911 Remembrance Day is also highly valued within the United States. Former Trump announced that he would be a boxing match commentator, joking that the probably easiest opponent to beat is the incumbent Biden. This reflects Trump's dissatisfaction with the defeat and strong criticism of Biden's defeat in Afghanistan.
In contrast, Biden took a serious stance by announcing that the nation would spend three days praying and honoring the victims of 911 and their families, and inviting people from all over the world to attend. However, it is worth pondering whether this is sufficient and whether it truly reflects the reflection of the United States.
After 911, the United States launched the war in Afghanistan, which lasted for 20 years. However, the United States has not become a terrorist organization in the Middle East and Central Asia, but has instead created a situation in which "the more anti-terrorism, the more terrorist." The supported Afghanistan** collapsed after the withdrawal of US troops, the Taliban returned to power, and the "export of democracy" of the United States became a joke.
The U.S. involvement in Afghanistan has brought insecurity, drug breeding, and a large number of refugees. And the $2 trillion war in Afghanistan has not brought about the desired results. That's 10 times Afghanistan's annual GDP, and if the United States had really wanted to help Afghanistan, it could have been used to build a prosperous country.
However, the failure of the United States in Afghanistan not only cost the country more than 3,000 soldiers, but also became a cash cow for arms dealers. The 911 incident is a tragedy, but the war in Afghanistan, launched by the United States under this pretext, is even more of a tragedy that has created more tragedies. The United States itself is a leader in Afghanistan.
Now, in an effort to shift its strategic focus, the United States has simply pulled out of Afghanistan. In order to maintain the excuse of 20 years ago, Biden has once again committed to fighting terrorism. However, his refusal to designate ETIM as a terrorist organization raised questions. There appears to be a double standard in the designation of terrorist organizations by the United States, which raises doubts about whether American-style counter-terrorism is merely in name.
Biden** claimed that he would carry out a precise counterattack, but it resulted in multiple civilians**. Judging from the fact that the United States has no clear standards for counter-terrorism, its counter-terrorism capability may not be as it says, but more like a slogan. The tragedy of 911 continued in the American war, raising questions about America's genuine concern for respect for life.
In this article, the author profoundly examines the 20-year US war on terror in Afghanistan and a range of issues associated with it. From the approach of the 20th anniversary of the 911 incident, to the rumors of the Taliban's provisional inauguration, to the political ridicule within the United States, the article covers many aspects and shows the author's in-depth thinking on this complex issue.
First of all, the author debunks rumors that the Taliban may hold a ceremony on the day of 911 and expresses a clear opinion on this, believing that if this scenario turns out, it will be a provocation to the United States and at the same time a clear support for terrorist groups. This shows the author's concern about the international political situation and his concern about the Taliban's actions.
Second, the article mentions the difference in attitudes between former Trump and current Biden on the anniversary of 911. Trump's high-profile comments on the boxing match, jokingly stating that the easiest opponent to beat is Biden, underscoring Trump's dissatisfaction with his own defeat in the ** and Biden's defeat in Afghanistan. Biden, on the other hand, announced in a serious manner that the United States would spend three days of prayer and remembrance, showing his solemn attitude towards the 911 incident. This contrast highlights the different styles of leaders within the United States in dealing with major national events.
Further, the article provides a profound analysis of the defeat of the United States in the war in Afghanistan. From the collapse of Afghanistan, which failed to be supported by terrorist groups, to the huge economic expenditures and gains of arms dealers, the author points to the enormous losses suffered by the United States in this war. The $2 trillion invested in the article compared to Afghanistan's annual GDP of only $20 billion undoubtedly raises questions about the effectiveness of US policies and calls for a deep rethinking of the Afghan issue.
Finally, the article questions the question of the attitude of the United States to the withdrawal from Afghanistan and terrorist groups. The refusal of the United States to designate ETIM as a terrorist organization while renewing its commitment to counterterrorism has raised concerns about the double standards of US counterterrorism policy. This makes people wonder whether the United States really has clear principles and standards on counter-terrorism, or whether it is simply defending its own interests.
Overall, the article provides an insightful analysis of complex and sensitive international political issues, conveying deep concern about developments and a scrutiny of the role of the United States in international affairs.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!