In the long history of the world, the army has always been the ultimate guarantee of ***, but the army should not dominate the country. Once the army dominates, it will bring extreme instability to the country and the miserable fate of the people. Worldwide, it's usually **commanding armies, and armies are not commanding**. However, Thailand is an exception, where the military has long dominated the regime, leading to social unrest. Now, people are looking at Vietnam, worrying about whether it will follow in Thailand's footsteps.
The shadow of the coup d'état in Thailand.
The political situation in Thailand has always been unstable, with coups d'état occurring every few years, and it has become common for the army to overthrow ** and expel the country's leaders. Once the policy of ** violates the interests of the army, it will face liquidation. Over the past 10 years, Thailand's prime minister has changed repeatedly, and each coup has set off a chaotic situation, resulting in Thailand's long-term development difficulties.
The formation of an army oligarchy.
The fundamental reason why Thailand is in such a predicament is that the army holds the lifeblood of the country and forms an army oligarchy. They controlled many of Thailand's industries and formed the largest interest groups, providing a solid basis for a coup d'état. Today, Vietnam's military is also gradually growing, and the scale of the army's business is expanding and its power is gradually becoming stronger.
Vietnam's militarized rise.
In recent years, Vietnam has shown a trend of militarization, especially the military's participation in business and industrial expansion. Once Vietnam's military achieves a pattern similar to that of Thailand, Vietnam may become a second Thailand. At present, the commercial interests of the Vietnamese army account for 10% of the country's GDP and are still expanding further.
The threat of military oligarchs.
Once the commercial interests of the Vietnamese army dominate the country's economy, there is a risk that the army will evolve into an army oligarchy, whose status and power will surpass the leaders and become the de facto masters. This will lead to political turmoil in Vietnam and a worrisome future for the country's development. Vietnam's leadership, perhaps aware of this, began to restrict and prohibit the military's involvement in business.
* The helplessness of the army and the strength of the army.
However, at present, the restrictive measures have had little effect. The military's business has become a complex issue involving the interests of tens of millions of people, and it is difficult to shake and change. Vietnam's future is uncertain, increasingly humble, and the country's future is clouded by the growing strength of its military.
Vietnam's future is in jeopardy.
As the military grows, it is becoming more and more difficult for Vietnam to control the lifeblood of the country. Once an army oligarchy is formed, Vietnam risks following in Thailand's footsteps and falling into political chaos and hindering the country's development. The Vietnamese leadership may have been aware of this, but it is facing a huge dilemma, and how to strike a balance between the army and the ** has become a major challenge for them.
Epilogue. 
Vietnam's future is fraught with uncertainties, and the power confrontation with the military is worrying. We should be wary of the formation of an army oligarchy to prevent Vietnam from following a political path similar to Thailand's. For Vietnam's leadership, maintaining the country's long-term peace and stability and developing the economy are still urgent tasks before them. Only by balancing the relationship between the military and the ** can Vietnam achieve a prosperous future.
Commentary: Vietnam's political situation and future development concerns.
In recent years, Vietnam's political changes have attracted widespread attention, especially the growing military in the country's economy, raising concerns about its future development. This article dissects the political crisis facing Vietnam in detail and contrasts it with the history of Thailand, which provoked me to think deeply about the political situation in Vietnam.
First of all, the article points out the powerful role of the army in the political economy, as well as the potential threat of this phenomenon to the stability of the country. The mode of doing business in the army, once it is too large, may form an army oligarchy, leading to the powerlessness of the army. This is evident in Thailand, where the threat appears to have resurfaced as a result of Vietnam's militarization. In this regard, I believe that ** needs to be cautious and take measures to ensure that the role of the military in the affairs of the state is reasonably limited and avoid falling into a similar predicament.
Secondly, the article mentions that Vietnam** has taken some restrictive measures, but the effect is minimal, and the issue of military business has involved the interests of tens of millions of people. This brings me to the question of the balance between the interests of society and the rights and interests of individuals. When formulating policies, the rights and interests of the general public need to be more carefully taken into account, and to ensure that the policies formulated do not lead to social instability and instability. In the case of Vietnam, there may be a need for more flexibility in adjusting policies to safeguard the overall interests of society.
The article also highlights the seriousness of the power confrontation with the military, as well as the importance of the need for the leadership to strike a balance on this issue. This reminds me of the wisdom and decision-making skills of leadership. Vietnam's leaders need to promote the country's economic development while maintaining the country's long-term peace and stability. How to strike a balance between the army and the ** is a problem that the leadership needs to seriously think about and deal with. Leaders need to have a high degree of political wisdom and a clear understanding of the overall situation of the country to be able to stabilize the situation in the face of political risks.
Finally, the article calls on everyone to be vigilant about the future of Vietnam's political situation. This appeal reminds me of the power of **. Public attention and supervision of the country's political situation are crucial to safeguarding the country's long-term interests. Vietnam's ** needs to take the public's opinions seriously, communicate with the people, build a common sense of national identity, and jointly promote the country's development.
Overall, there are some potential risks to the development of Vietnam's political situation, and the article delves into these issues and makes some suggestions for the future. It is hoped that Vietnam's leaders will take this as a warning and adopt smart and flexible policies to ensure that the country can achieve long-term peace and prosperity.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!