Why has modern France lost its former tenacity?
The reason why a big country is so prestigious that no one dares to provoke it is fundamentally because of its stubbornness. The fact that there is no flinching in the face of problems and threats, and that the natural position is constantly rising, is confirmed on the world stage, and Russia is the most typical example.
However, France seems to have become an exception to this principle. He surrendered in World War II, but after the war, he showed a tough side, withdrew from NATO, confronted the United States, established diplomatic relations with China, and actively developed the Third World. France enjoyed a high position in the world and even established its own sphere of influence during the Cold War, showing a trend towards the return of the French Empire.
The glory of the past.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, France remained steadfast in its push for the European Union and the integration process, rejecting many of the decisions of the United States. Even in the Sarkozy era, France was equally firm in its approach to international affairs, and even more so in its treatment of Libya, it maintained a strong presence around the world. France rejects all things that harm its own interests, and even does not give face to the United States.
A turning point.
At the moment, however, France is showing a clear weakness. From the Alstom incident, the French incident, to the Australian submarine incident, and now to the energy crisis, it can be seen that France is no longer firm and unable to effectively protect its rights and interests. France seems to be left with only a small follower, and it is difficult to make a difference.
The disappearance of hardness.
So why is modern France no longer resilient?There is only one fundamental reason - "I can't help myself"!For decades, the United States exercised total control over the disobedient power of France, especially in terms of politics and **. Nowadays, it is almost impossible to become a French ** without the support of the United States. Many ** and politicians have entered the political arena with the support of the United States.
American control.
The United States can suppress France at any time, and even a small increase in fuel taxes can trigger a huge crisis in French society, highlighting the control of the United States over French society. Therefore, if France dares to remain tough and oppose the United States, it may be in the next second.
Yield and accompany the smiley face.
This is the fundamental reason why modern French leaders are unable to maintain their stubbornness. Once you give in, you have to be accompanied by a smiling face, which has become an unavoidable reality for the French leadership. What do you think about this?Welcome to leave a message, together**.
Epilogue. In modern France, the tenacity of the past is gone. The control of the United States has caused France to lose its independent foreign policy and no longer dare to defend its own rights and interests. Where to go from the "hard gas" of the past may be an important issue facing French politics. Welcome to pay attention, update fresh historical information for you every day, don't go out to see the world!
The disappearance of the "hard air" in modern France is indeed a thought-provoking phenomenon. The article points out that France was weak in World War II, but after the war, it showed a tough side, withdrawing from NATO, confronting the United States, establishing diplomatic relations with China, and actively developing the third world, which shows that France had a certain firm position in international affairs at that time. In recent years, however, France's foreign policy has gradually become more compromised and has lost its former tenacity. I have some thoughts on this phenomenon.
First of all, the article mentions the total control that the United States has exercised over France for a long time, especially in terms of politics and **. This is indeed a profound analysis that shows that France has lost its autonomy to a certain extent. In modern international relations, control and influence between major powers are the norm, but France seems to have fallen into a passive situation from which it cannot escape. In the era of globalization, where relations between countries are complex, France may feel an insurmountable obstacle in the game with the United States, so it has opted for a relatively compromising diplomatic strategy.
Second, the article mentions the phenomenon that French leaders need the support of the United States to be elected. This dependency deprives France of its independence in international affairs, as the leader may be swayed to some extent by the will of the United States. This situation may lead to France's international policy taking more into account the feelings of the United States than its own interests, making it difficult for France to assert its hard power at some critical moments.
In addition, the article mentions that the United States can attack France at any time and provoke a huge crisis in French society through some small measures. In such a situation, the French leader may be looking out for the wind when formulating policy and avoid confrontation with the United States, lest it provoke a domestic crisis. This timid diplomatic attitude is also a reason why France has lost its "toughness".
In general, the reasons for the loss of "hardness" in France are manifold, both international and domestic. In the context of globalization, the interdependence between countries has intensified, and the control and influence between major powers have become the norm. However, how to maintain independence while safeguarding national interests is a problem that France needs to seriously consider and solve in the future.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!