It happened on December 15Netizens sued the "Xinhua Dictionary" incident, aroused widespread concern in the society!
The two bloggers who formally sued the "Xinhua Dictionary", Associate Professor Qian Yi and Associate Professor Liu Zhencheng, questioned multiple entries in the "Xinhua Dictionary" one by one, arguing:Some of the contents in the "Xinhua Dictionary" are suspected of violating relevant laws and regulations, and may even have a negative impact on the physical and mental development of minors
Justified?Or, in grandstanding?
In this regard, I just want to say: must be supported!
Let's take a look at some of the facts below.
Sexuality？！Your interpretation is clearly disrespectful to female compatriots, right?
The child is a burden when he is small？！I just want to ask, why is it a burden when the child is small?You've got to give everyone an explanation:
Also, the 12th edition does not".WakosYou are already suspected of violating the Law of the People's Republic of China on Patriotic Education, you know no:
And it is particularly noteworthy that the 12th edition of the Xinhua Dictionary will".WakosIn fact, strictly speaking, it is not a new thing that has caused controversy now, in fact, as early as June before, this matter has attracted the attention and discussion of netizens.
In addition, on June 27, a reporter visited Xinhua Bookstore and found:The word "倭寇" is indeed no longer found in the 12th edition of the Xinhua Dictionary;At the same time, you can find the word "倭寇" and related explanations in other editions of dictionaries and dictionaries of the same publishing house!
To sum up, therefore, in the end, I can't help but ask: "Xinhua Dictionary", how do you explain it?!