Does the armistice agreement of the Iran-Iraq war violate international basic principles?
The Iran-Iraq War was a fierce conflict between Iraq and Iran in the late eighties and early nineties of the twentieth century. The war caused a large number of human and property losses and caused serious economic and social damage to both countries. In order to end the war, the United Nations and other international organizations actively intervened and facilitated the signing of an armistice agreement on the Iran-Iraq war. However, some have questioned whether the agreement violates basic international principles. This issue will be reviewed and analysed in this article.
The basic principles of international affairs are the norms of conduct that the international community adheres to and aims to maintain and promote peace, security and cooperation among States. However, there is controversy over whether the armistice agreement violates these basic principles.
On the one hand, supporters see the armistice agreement of the Iran-Iraq war as a positive action taken by the international community to maintain peace. The signing of the agreement provides an opportunity for the two countries to end the war and restore peace. By mediating their differences, the agreement provides a path for the two countries to resolve their dispute peacefully. In addition, the agreement sets out a code of conduct that both sides should abide by in order to ensure the stability and sustainability of the armistice. From this point of view, the armistice agreement of the Iran-Iraq war is in line with the basic principles of the international community.
On the other hand, however, critics argue that the armistice agreement of the Iran-Iraq war has some problems that run counter to basic international principles. First, the agreement does not provide for accountability and punishment for war crimes and human rights violations in war, which is contrary to the basic principles of international law. The international community has been advocating for accountability and sanctions for war crimes to ensure that justice is done. In addition, some clauses in the agreement may harm the interests of other countries, for example in terms of border demarcation and resource allocation. Such one-sided approaches could undermine the principles of justice and equality in the international community.
To sum up, there is controversy over whether the armistice agreement of the Iran-Iraq war violates basic international principles. The agreement provides an opportunity to end the war and restore peace, but there are also some problems that may violate basic international principles. In order to resolve this dispute, the international community should actively participate in and monitor the implementation of the agreement to ensure that it complies with international law and fundamental principles. At the same time, all parties should strengthen their understanding of and respect for basic international principles in order to promote the realization of peace, security and cooperation. It is only through joint efforts that a more harmonious and stable international order can be established.
Quality Author Certification Recruitment