In 1995, a tragedy that occurred at Tsinghua University shocked the whole country, and the case of thallium poisoning of female student Zhu Ling became the focus of social attention. However, after many years, this case has not been solved and has become an unsolved case. Recently, Zhu Ling's death has once again aroused concern, making people think about the dilemma of criminal proceedings and the pursuit of the truth of the case.
Background
At the end of 1994, Zhu Ling began to have strange symptoms of poisoning, but at the time of the case, scientific and technological means were relatively lagging behind, making the case complicated and the evidence difficult to preserve. During the long wait, Zhu Ling experienced both physical and mental torture, and society also questioned the progress of the case.
Problems and dilemmas
The lack of monitoring facilities at the time of the crime led to the loss of key evidence, which became the main difficulty in solving the case. The special nature of thallium poisoning cases makes it extremely difficult to investigate, the symptoms of the victims are not obvious, and the source of the poisoning is difficult to identify. The correct identification of criminals requires conclusive and undoubted evidence, and verbal evidence alone can easily lead to unjust, false and wrongly decided cases.
Social concerns
Zhu Ling's case is not only a family tragedy, but also a reflection on the social criminal procedure system. Similar cases, such as the Huge case and the Nie Shubin case, make people feel the weakness of the judicial system.
Zhu Ling's death does not mean the end of the case, on the contrary, it should be another call for social justice. It is hoped that the public security organs will make unremitting efforts to use modern technological means to continue to follow up on the clues of the case and seek justice for Zhu Ling.
The end of the unsolved case and the death of Zhu Ling have made us think deeply about the problems of the criminal procedure system again. In the future, we hope that the judiciary will be more technological and fair, so as to ensure that the truth of every case can be revealed and justice can be done for the victims.